A holistic approach to understanding undergraduates: Campus engagement, library use and psychological factors

This article reports on the findings of assessment tools designed to measure undergraduate students' academic engagement, psychological factors (self-regulation), factors affecting academic work, and students' evaluation of their academic success. Two assessment tools (Student Academic Engagement and Success Survey and Online Weekly Journal) were developed to explore these relationships. The Student Academic Engagement and Success Survey was distributed online to undergraduate students and the Online Weekly Journal was used to measure student engagement over an 8-week period with a subgroup of the survey participants. The use of the physical and online library emerged as the top two frequently utilized campus resources. Factors that affected students' performance related to their academic work included stress, social media, and socializing with friends. Students who perceived themselves as not meeting their academic success goals may have compensated by utilizing library resources more frequently. The findings highlight the complex dynamics of students' characteristics, academic engagement, library utilization, their ability to manage their behaviors, and various factors shaping their perception of academic success. • Library visits and website use were top activities for all campus engagement. • Students with a GPA of 2.5–2.99 GPA were the least frequent library users. • Students struggled to avoid distractions and maintain concentration. • Stress and social media emerged as top factors affecting academic work.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
The Journal of Academic Librarianship
Published
2024-09-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acalib.2024.102936
Citations
5
Primary Topic
Library Science and Information Literacy
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
12.70

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A holistic approach to understanding undergraduates: Campus engagement, library use and psychological factors

Sandra L. De Groote, Jung Mi Scoulas, Kimberly Shotick, Nestor L. Osorio
5 citations
The Journal of Academic Librarianship
Library Science and Information Literacy
12.70
article

A holistic approach to understanding undergraduates: Campus engagement, library use and psychological factors

Sandra L. De Groote, Jung Mi Scoulas, Kimberly Shotick, Nestor L. Osorio
article en
5 citations

Abstract

This article reports on the findings of assessment tools designed to measure undergraduate students' academic engagement, psychological factors (self-regulation), factors affecting academic work, and students' evaluation of their academic success. Two assessment tools (Student Academic Engagement and Success Survey and Online Weekly Journal) were developed to explore these relationships. The Student Academic Engagement and Success Survey was distributed online to undergraduate students and the Online Weekly Journal was used to measure student engagement over an 8-week period with a subgroup of the survey participants. The use of the physical and online library emerged as the top two frequently utilized campus resources. Factors that affected students' performance related to their academic work included stress, social media, and socializing with friends. Students who perceived themselves as not meeting their academic success goals may have compensated by utilizing library resources more frequently. The findings highlight the complex dynamics of students' characteristics, academic engagement, library utilization, their ability to manage their behaviors, and various factors shaping their perception of academic success. • Library visits and website use were top activities for all campus engagement. • Students with a GPA of 2.5–2.99 GPA were the least frequent library users. • Students struggled to avoid distractions and maintain concentration. • Stress and social media emerged as top factors affecting academic work.

The Journal of Academic LibrarianshipVol. 50(5)
Northern Illinois University (US), University of Illinois Chicago (US), Chicago Public Library (US), Center for Research Libraries (US)
Institute of Museum and Library Services
Openalex Percentile: Top 1%
Library Science and Information Literacy
12.70
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.