Performance Implications of Digital Disruption in Strategic Competition

Pervasive digitalization is changing how firms engage in strategic competition. Some firms are pursuing digital disruption strategies, using digital resources to rewire their value chain and change the landscape of their industry by redefining performance expectations. Other firms are adapting to digitalization by adding digital resources into their existing value chain. Through NK model simulations, we advance our understanding of digital disruption vis-à-vis adaptation in strategic competition in two main ways. First, we unearth important nuances in performance trade-offs: A digital disruption strategy may be effective for relative performance at the expense of absolute performance gains. Second, we explore relevant market- and competitor-related conditions under which firms should opt (or not) for a digital disruption strategy.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
MIS Quarterly
Published
2024-09-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.25300/misq/2024/17999
Citations
4
Primary Topic
Digital Platforms and Economics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.22

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Performance Implications of Digital Disruption in Strategic Competition

Murat Tarakci, Fabian J. Sting, Jan Recker
4 citations
MIS Quarterly
Digital Platforms and Economics
2.22
article

Performance Implications of Digital Disruption in Strategic Competition

Murat Tarakci, Fabian J. Sting, Jan Recker
article en
4 citations

Abstract

Pervasive digitalization is changing how firms engage in strategic competition. Some firms are pursuing digital disruption strategies, using digital resources to rewire their value chain and change the landscape of their industry by redefining performance expectations. Other firms are adapting to digitalization by adding digital resources into their existing value chain. Through NK model simulations, we advance our understanding of digital disruption vis-à-vis adaptation in strategic competition in two main ways. First, we unearth important nuances in performance trade-offs: A digital disruption strategy may be effective for relative performance at the expense of absolute performance gains. Second, we explore relevant market- and competitor-related conditions under which firms should opt (or not) for a digital disruption strategy.

MIS QuarterlyVol. 48(3)
Universität Hamburg (DE), University of Cologne (DE), Hamburg School of Business Administration (DE), Erasmus University Rotterdam (NL)
Syddansk Universitet, Universität zu Köln
Openalex Percentile: Top 10%
Digital Platforms and Economics
2.22
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.