Impact of the serrated pathway on the simulated comparative effectiveness of colorectal cancer screening tests
When the serrated pathway is considered, modeling suggests that colonoscopy is cost-effective vs FIT. In contrast, modeling suggests that sDNA-FIT is not cost-effective vs FIT despite its greater sensitivity for SSLs, even if a substantial minority of CRCs arise from SSLs.
Authors
- Reinier G.S. Meester (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4645-1221)
- Uri Ladabaum (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9328-4545)
Institutions
- Freenome (United States) (US)
- Stanford Medicine (US)
- Stanford University (US)
Publication Details
- Journal
- JNCI Cancer Spectrum
- Published
- 2024-09-02
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.1093/jncics/pkae077
- Citations
- 2
- Primary Topic
- Colorectal Cancer Screening and Detection
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 0.57
Funders
- Nederlandse Organisatie voor Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek
- Stanford Research Computing Center, Stanford University