Medical Device Database: Scoping Lifecycle Review

Objectives: This study examines the utilization and lifecycle management of medical device databases in multiple regions including the United States, Europe, Japan, and Canada, and evaluates their public health impact. The objective is to identify best practices, gaps, and challenges in the current systems to inform future improvements and standardization efforts on a global scale.Methods: A comprehensive comparative analysis was conducted on databases in these regions. The analysis focused on the structure, operation, and application of these databases in lifecycle management. Key factors include data collection, integration, utilization throughout the product lifecycle, data accessibility, user interfaces, integration with other healthcare data, regulatory compliance, and public health impacts. Data were collected through literature reviews, policy documents, and expert interviews to provide a robust understanding of each system.Results: Results show reveal significant variations in how regions utilize medical device databases to enhance device safety and efficacy. While all regions aim to improve device safety and public health outcomes, there are notable differences in data accessibility, usage, and management practices. Comprehensive coverage of the medical device lifecycle from pre-market approval to post-market surveillance varies significantly. Integration with regulatory processes and support for public health interventions through detailed tracking and reporting mechanisms also differ widely. Data accessibility and integration with national databases remain challenging. Inconsistent data formats, varying levels of data granularity, and differences in regulatory requirements hinder effective global monitoring and comparison. Despite these challenges, the study highlights the potential for medical device databases to significantly enhance healthcare quality and patient safety.Conclusions: National medical device databases are crucial for improving healthcare quality and safety. They serve as vital tools for identifying issues and informing policy-making. Korea should consider developing a comprehensive database focused on user health protection and safety enhancement, aligned with global standards.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Health Informatics and Statistics
Published
2024-08-31
DOI
https://doi.org/10.21032/jhis.2024.49.3.216
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Quality and Safety in Healthcare
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.94

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Medical Device Database: Scoping Lifecycle Review

Hee-Soo Yang, Jong Hyock Park, So Young Kim, Chan Young Park et al.
1 citations
Journal of Health Informatics and Statistics
Quality and Safety in Healthcare
0.94
article

Medical Device Database: Scoping Lifecycle Review

Hee-Soo Yang, Jong Hyock Park, So Young Kim, Chan Young Park, Seongwoo Jeon
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Objectives: This study examines the utilization and lifecycle management of medical device databases in multiple regions including the United States, Europe, Japan, and Canada, and evaluates their public health impact. The objective is to identify best practices, gaps, and challenges in the current systems to inform future improvements and standardization efforts on a global scale.Methods: A comprehensive comparative analysis was conducted on databases in these regions. The analysis focused on the structure, operation, and application of these databases in lifecycle management. Key factors include data collection, integration, utilization throughout the product lifecycle, data accessibility, user interfaces, integration with other healthcare data, regulatory compliance, and public health impacts. Data were collected through literature reviews, policy documents, and expert interviews to provide a robust understanding of each system.Results: Results show reveal significant variations in how regions utilize medical device databases to enhance device safety and efficacy. While all regions aim to improve device safety and public health outcomes, there are notable differences in data accessibility, usage, and management practices. Comprehensive coverage of the medical device lifecycle from pre-market approval to post-market surveillance varies significantly. Integration with regulatory processes and support for public health interventions through detailed tracking and reporting mechanisms also differ widely. Data accessibility and integration with national databases remain challenging. Inconsistent data formats, varying levels of data granularity, and differences in regulatory requirements hinder effective global monitoring and comparison. Despite these challenges, the study highlights the potential for medical device databases to significantly enhance healthcare quality and patient safety.Conclusions: National medical device databases are crucial for improving healthcare quality and safety. They serve as vital tools for identifying issues and informing policy-making. Korea should consider developing a comprehensive database focused on user health protection and safety enhancement, aligned with global standards.

Journal of Health Informatics and StatisticsVol. 49(3)
Ministry of Food and Drug Safety
Openalex Percentile: Top 17%
Quality and Safety in Healthcare
0.94
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.