Using Q‐methodology for policy research and stakeholder engagement to strengthen public health in large‐scale mining in Mozambique

Abstract Mining projects can have adverse effects on public health, potentially impacting the 2030 Sustainable Development Agenda. While environmental impacts are typically addressed through mandatory environmental impact assessments, public health consequences often receive inadequate attention, despite being a major concern for affected communities. Policy instruments for mitigating these public health issues, including health impact assessment (HIA), remain underutilized, particularly in Africa. We conduct a Q‐methodology study in Mozambique to (1) identify policy preferences of government, private sector, and civil society stakeholders for regulating public health in large‐scale mining projects; and (2) to actively engage local stakeholders in a national‐level dialogue on strengthening public health in impact assessment practise. The findings were successfully used to initiate and inform a policy dialogue in cooperation with local public health professionals and public health institutions, as well as policymakers in the respective ministries.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Sustainable Development
Published
2024-09-05
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/sd.3175
Citations
6
Primary Topic
Q Methodology Applications
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.94

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Using Q‐methodology for policy research and stakeholder engagement to strengthen public health in large‐scale mining in Mozambique

Leonardo Chavane, Joschka J. Proksik, Hermínio Cossa, Eusébio Macete et al.
6 citations
Sustainable Development
Q Methodology Applications
2.94
article

Using Q‐methodology for policy research and stakeholder engagement to strengthen public health in large‐scale mining in Mozambique

Leonardo Chavane, Joschka J. Proksik, Hermínio Cossa, Eusébio Macete, Fritz Brugger
article en
6 citations

Abstract

Abstract Mining projects can have adverse effects on public health, potentially impacting the 2030 Sustainable Development Agenda. While environmental impacts are typically addressed through mandatory environmental impact assessments, public health consequences often receive inadequate attention, despite being a major concern for affected communities. Policy instruments for mitigating these public health issues, including health impact assessment (HIA), remain underutilized, particularly in Africa. We conduct a Q‐methodology study in Mozambique to (1) identify policy preferences of government, private sector, and civil society stakeholders for regulating public health in large‐scale mining projects; and (2) to actively engage local stakeholders in a national‐level dialogue on strengthening public health in impact assessment practise. The findings were successfully used to initiate and inform a policy dialogue in cooperation with local public health professionals and public health institutions, as well as policymakers in the respective ministries.

Sustainable DevelopmentVol. 33(1)
Eduardo Mondlane University (MZ), ETH Zurich (CH), Manhiça Health Research Centre (MZ)
Schweizerischer Nationalfonds zur Förderung der Wissenschaftlichen Forschung
Openalex Percentile: Top 9%
Q Methodology Applications
2.94
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.