Unpacking cross‐country variations in domestic worker protection regimes: Adopting a policy regime perspective

Domestic workers are some of the most vulnerable and least protected workers in the world. However, there is significant variation in domestic worker protections across countries. Using a policy regime perspective, I unpack how differing ideas, institutional arrangements and interest groups inform differences in the degree of legal protections that a country provides domestic workers. I posit that only if all three of these building blocks are present and supportive will a country institute a strong domestic worker protection regime. I apply this model to explain the incomplete/weak domestic worker protection regimes in Pakistan, Singapore, South Africa and Sweden.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Labour Review
Published
2024-09-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/ilr.12432
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Labor Movements and Unions
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.86
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Unpacking cross‐country variations in domestic worker protection regimes: Adopting a policy regime perspective

Anju Mary Paul
1 citations
International Labour Review
Labor Movements and Unions
0.86
article

Unpacking cross‐country variations in domestic worker protection regimes: Adopting a policy regime perspective

Anju Mary Paul
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Domestic workers are some of the most vulnerable and least protected workers in the world. However, there is significant variation in domestic worker protections across countries. Using a policy regime perspective, I unpack how differing ideas, institutional arrangements and interest groups inform differences in the degree of legal protections that a country provides domestic workers. I posit that only if all three of these building blocks are present and supportive will a country institute a strong domestic worker protection regime. I apply this model to explain the incomplete/weak domestic worker protection regimes in Pakistan, Singapore, South Africa and Sweden.

International Labour ReviewVol. 163(3)
New York University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 25%
Labor Movements and Unions
0.86
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.