The global drivers of wildfire

Changes in wildfire regimes are of growing concern and raise issues about how well we can model risks in a changing climate. Process-based coupled fire-vegetation models, used to project future wildfire regimes, capture many aspects of wildfire regimes poorly. However, there is now a wealth of information from empirical studies on the climate, vegetation, topography and human activity controls on wildfire regimes. The measures used to quantify these controls vary among studies, but certain variables consistently emerge as the most important: gross primary production as a measure of fuel availability, vegetation cover as a measure of fuel continuity, and atmospheric humidity as a measure of fuel drying. Contrary to popular perception, ignitions are generally not a limiting factor for wildfires. In this review, we describe how empirical fire models implement wildfire processes, synthesise current understanding of the controls on wildfire extent and severity, and suggest ways in which fire modelling could be improved.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Frontiers in Environmental Science
Published
2024-09-06
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3389/fenvs.2024.1438262
Citations
18
Primary Topic
Fire effects on ecosystems
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
4.80

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The global drivers of wildfire

José Gómez‐Dans, Olivia Haas, I. Colin Prentice, Theodore Keeping et al.
18 citations
Frontiers in Environmental Science
Fire effects on ecosystems
4.80
article

The global drivers of wildfire

José Gómez‐Dans, Olivia Haas, I. Colin Prentice, Theodore Keeping, Sandy P. Harrison
article en
18 citations

Abstract

Changes in wildfire regimes are of growing concern and raise issues about how well we can model risks in a changing climate. Process-based coupled fire-vegetation models, used to project future wildfire regimes, capture many aspects of wildfire regimes poorly. However, there is now a wealth of information from empirical studies on the climate, vegetation, topography and human activity controls on wildfire regimes. The measures used to quantify these controls vary among studies, but certain variables consistently emerge as the most important: gross primary production as a measure of fuel availability, vegetation cover as a measure of fuel continuity, and atmospheric humidity as a measure of fuel drying. Contrary to popular perception, ignitions are generally not a limiting factor for wildfires. In this review, we describe how empirical fire models implement wildfire processes, synthesise current understanding of the controls on wildfire extent and severity, and suggest ways in which fire modelling could be improved.

Frontiers in Environmental ScienceVol. 12
King's College London (GB), National Centre for Earth Observation (GB), Imperial College London (GB), University of Reading (GB)
Leverhulme Trust
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Fire effects on ecosystems
4.80
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.