Clear the fog: Can public–private collaborative supervision promote the construction of a high‐quality public health system?

Abstract Approaches to stimulating the initiative of collaborative cooperation of multiple subjects and the enthusiasm of public–private collaborative supervision are important to ensure the high‐quality development of the social public health system. This study constructs a four‐agent evolutionary game model with a medical enterprise, health administrative department, medical institution, and the social public as the core subjects. Using MATLAB 2018b to conduct simulation analysis, the cooperation strategy and operation mechanism of multiple subjects in the social public health system under public–private collaborative supervision are revealed, and the evolutionary stability strategy of multiple subjects under different situations is further explored. The results show (1) three evolutionary stability points in the system, which all exist in a state of loose government supervision. (2) Increasing the penalty limit can effectively regulate the behavior of medical enterprises and medical institutions; however, it is not conducive to the performance efficiency of the government in the long run. (3) Government incentives can stimulate the enthusiasm of all subjects to participate in the social public health system but should be controlled within a reasonable range. Excessive financial incentives make it easy for medical enterprises and institutions to form policy dependence.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Managerial and Decision Economics
Published
2024-09-05
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/mde.4349
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Mental Health and Patient Involvement
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.70

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Clear the fog: Can public–private collaborative supervision promote the construction of a high‐quality public health system?

Guoping Zhang, Jing Zhang, Lin Zhang, Neng Shen et al.
2 citations
Managerial and Decision Economics
Mental Health and Patient Involvement
1.70
article

Clear the fog: Can public–private collaborative supervision promote the construction of a high‐quality public health system?

Guoping Zhang, Jing Zhang, Lin Zhang, Neng Shen, Yang Chun Cao
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Abstract Approaches to stimulating the initiative of collaborative cooperation of multiple subjects and the enthusiasm of public–private collaborative supervision are important to ensure the high‐quality development of the social public health system. This study constructs a four‐agent evolutionary game model with a medical enterprise, health administrative department, medical institution, and the social public as the core subjects. Using MATLAB 2018b to conduct simulation analysis, the cooperation strategy and operation mechanism of multiple subjects in the social public health system under public–private collaborative supervision are revealed, and the evolutionary stability strategy of multiple subjects under different situations is further explored. The results show (1) three evolutionary stability points in the system, which all exist in a state of loose government supervision. (2) Increasing the penalty limit can effectively regulate the behavior of medical enterprises and medical institutions; however, it is not conducive to the performance efficiency of the government in the long run. (3) Government incentives can stimulate the enthusiasm of all subjects to participate in the social public health system but should be controlled within a reasonable range. Excessive financial incentives make it easy for medical enterprises and institutions to form policy dependence.

Managerial and Decision EconomicsVol. 46(1)
Guangdong Ocean University (CN), Fuzhou University (CN)
National Natural Science Foundation of China, Jilin Office of Philosophy and Social Science, National Office for Philosophy and Social Sciences, Guangdong Ocean University
Openalex Percentile: Top 14%
Mental Health and Patient Involvement
1.70
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.