Acceptability of de-intensified screening for women at low risk of breast cancer: a randomised online experimental survey

We found no difference in the acceptability of later start age vs. longer screening intervals for women at low risk of breast cancer in a large sample of women who were screening naïve. Although acceptability of both risk-adapted scenarios was lower than for standard age-based screening, overall acceptability was reasonable. The positive associations between knowledge and both cognitive and emotional acceptability suggests clear and reassuring communication about the rationale for de-intensified screening may enhance acceptability.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
BMC Cancer
Published
2024-09-06
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12885-024-12847-w
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Global Cancer Incidence and Screening
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.85

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Acceptability of de-intensified screening for women at low risk of breast cancer: a randomised online experimental survey

C. Jones, Jo Waller, Suzanne E. Scott
3 citations
BMC Cancer
Global Cancer Incidence and Screening
0.85
article

Acceptability of de-intensified screening for women at low risk of breast cancer: a randomised online experimental survey

C. Jones, Jo Waller, Suzanne E. Scott
article en
3 citations

Abstract

We found no difference in the acceptability of later start age vs. longer screening intervals for women at low risk of breast cancer in a large sample of women who were screening naïve. Although acceptability of both risk-adapted scenarios was lower than for standard age-based screening, overall acceptability was reasonable. The positive associations between knowledge and both cognitive and emotional acceptability suggests clear and reassuring communication about the rationale for de-intensified screening may enhance acceptability.

BMC CancerVol. 24(1)
Queen Mary University of London (GB), King's College London (GB), Genomics England (GB)
Breast Cancer Now
Gender equality
Openalex Percentile: Top 22%
Global Cancer Incidence and Screening
0.85
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.