Reference CC3 Excitation Energies for Organic Chromophores: Benchmarking TD-DFT, BSE/<i>GW</i>, and Wave Function Methods

To expand the QUEST database of highly accurate vertical transition energies, we consider a series of large organic chromogens ubiquitous in dye chemistry, such as anthraquinone, azobenzene, BODIPY, and naphthalimide. We compute, at the CC3 level of theory, the singlet and triplet vertical transition energies associated with the low-lying excited states. This leads to a collection of more than 120 new highly accurate excitation energies. For several singlet transitions, we have been able to determine CCSDT transition energies with a compact basis set, finding minimal deviations from the CC3 values for most states. Subsequently, we employ these reference values to benchmark a series of lower-order wave function approaches, including the popular ADC(2) and CC2 schemes, as well as time-dependent density-functional theory (TD-DFT), both with and without applying the Tamm-Dancoff approximation (TDA). At the TD-DFT level, we evaluate a large panel of global, range-separated, local, and double hybrid functionals. Additionally, we assess the performance of the Bethe-Salpeter equation (BSE) formalism relying on both <i>G</i><sub>0</sub><i>W</i><sub>0</sub> and ev<i>GW</i> quasiparticle energies evaluated from various starting points. It turns out that CC2 and ADC(2.5) are the most accurate models among those with respective <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"><mml:mi>O</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mn>5</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math> and <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"><mml:mi>O</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mn>6</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math> scalings with system size. In contrast, CCSD does not outperform CC2. The best performing exchange-correlation functionals include BMK, M06-2X, M06-SX, CAM-B3LYP, ωB97X-D, and LH20t, with average deviations of approximately 0.20 eV or slightly below. Errors on vertical excitation energies can be further reduced by considering double hybrids. Both SOS-ωB88PP86 and SOS-ωPBEPP86 exhibit particularly attractive performances with overall quality on par with CC2, whereas PBE0-DH and PBE-QIDH are only slightly less efficient. BSE/ev<i>GW</i> calculations based on Kohn-Sham starting points have been found to be particularly effective for singlet transitions, but much less for their triplet counterparts.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation
Published
2024-09-05
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jctc.4c00906
Citations
20
Primary Topic
Photochemistry and Electron Transfer Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
8.90

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Reference CC3 Excitation Energies for Organic Chromophores: Benchmarking TD-DFT, BSE/GW, and Wave Function Methods

Denis Jacquemin, Pierre‐François Loos, Filippo Lipparini, Xavier Blase et al.
20 citations
Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation
Photochemistry and Electron Transfer Studies
8.90
article

Reference CC3 Excitation Energies for Organic Chromophores: Benchmarking TD-DFT, BSE/GW, and Wave Function Methods

Denis Jacquemin, Pierre‐François Loos, Filippo Lipparini, Xavier Blase, Iryna Knysh, Aymeric Blondel, Ivan Duchemin
article en
20 citations

Abstract

To expand the QUEST database of highly accurate vertical transition energies, we consider a series of large organic chromogens ubiquitous in dye chemistry, such as anthraquinone, azobenzene, BODIPY, and naphthalimide. We compute, at the CC3 level of theory, the singlet and triplet vertical transition energies associated with the low-lying excited states. This leads to a collection of more than 120 new highly accurate excitation energies. For several singlet transitions, we have been able to determine CCSDT transition energies with a compact basis set, finding minimal deviations from the CC3 values for most states. Subsequently, we employ these reference values to benchmark a series of lower-order wave function approaches, including the popular ADC(2) and CC2 schemes, as well as time-dependent density-functional theory (TD-DFT), both with and without applying the Tamm-Dancoff approximation (TDA). At the TD-DFT level, we evaluate a large panel of global, range-separated, local, and double hybrid functionals. Additionally, we assess the performance of the Bethe-Salpeter equation (BSE) formalism relying on both <i>G</i><sub>0</sub><i>W</i><sub>0</sub> and ev<i>GW</i> quasiparticle energies evaluated from various starting points. It turns out that CC2 and ADC(2.5) are the most accurate models among those with respective <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"><mml:mi>O</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mn>5</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math> and <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"><mml:mi>O</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mn>6</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math> scalings with system size. In contrast, CCSD does not outperform CC2. The best performing exchange-correlation functionals include BMK, M06-2X, M06-SX, CAM-B3LYP, ωB97X-D, and LH20t, with average deviations of approximately 0.20 eV or slightly below. Errors on vertical excitation energies can be further reduced by considering double hybrids. Both SOS-ωB88PP86 and SOS-ωPBEPP86 exhibit particularly attractive performances with overall quality on par with CC2, whereas PBE0-DH and PBE-QIDH are only slightly less efficient. BSE/ev<i>GW</i> calculations based on Kohn-Sham starting points have been found to be particularly effective for singlet transitions, but much less for their triplet counterparts.

Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation
University of Pisa (IT), Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (FR), Université Toulouse III - Paul Sabatier (FR), Université Fédérale de Toulouse Midi-Pyrénées (FR), Institut Universitaire de France (FR), Commissariat à l'Énergie Atomique et aux Énergies Alternatives (FR), CEA Grenoble (FR), Chimie et Interdisciplinarité, Synthèse, Analyse, Modélisation (FR), Laboratoire de Chimie et Physique Quantiques (FR), Institut Néel (FR), Université Grenoble Alpes (FR), Nantes Université (FR)
Agence Nationale de la Recherche, H2020 European Research Council
Affordable and clean energy
Openalex Percentile: Top 1%
Photochemistry and Electron Transfer Studies
8.90
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.