NS-AUA 2024 Annual Meeting Abstracts – Female Urology, Incontinence

Introduction: Stress urinary incontinence (SUI) includes loss of urethral support and intrinsic sphincter deficiency (ISD).We aimed to enhance SUI by integrating intraurethral (IU) with intravaginal (IV) non-ablative Er: YAG laser therapy.The primary objective was to evaluate the safety of IU+IV laser therapy for SUI with ISD components and compare it to IV only and sham through six-and 12-month followups.The secondary objective was to assess the efficacy of the IU+IV and IV-only treatments compared to sham.Methods: Women with proven SUI with a degree of ISD were randomized into IU+IV laser treatment (n=20), IV laser treatment (n=20), and sham control (n=15).The sham subjects were offered the active treatment after a six-month followup.Subjects in both active groups were followed out to 12 months post-treatment.Tolerability and safety were assessed by VAS pain scale, recording of adverse events (AE), and measuring uroflow and post-void residual (PVR).Secondary effectiveness endpoints were assessed by 24-hour pad test, three-day voiding diary, and ICIQ-UI SF and PGI-I questionnaires. Results:We randomized 55 patients into three groups, and 53 patients completed the trial.Thirty-nine adverse events (AEs) were recorded in 23 patients.Seventeen of the 39 recorded AEs were probably related or related to the procedure.Mean (SD) duration of the AEs was 2.93 (3.2) days.The PVR results revealed no clinically meaningful differences between groups (p=0.49), the same as for voiding symptoms at six (p=0.19) or 12 months (p=0.76).At six-month and 12-month followup, >50% reduction of 24-hour pad weight was observed in 64.7% (55.6%) of patients in the IU+IV group, 36.8% (58.8%) in the IV group, and 33.3% in the sham group.The odds of observing a >50% reduction of 24-hour pad weight at six months increased by 246% in the IV+IU arm compared to IV (OR=3.46[0.89-14.9];p=0.08).Conclusions: The addition of the intraurethral treatment did not result in a higher incidence of AEs.In patients with a degree of ISD, combining intraurethral and intravaginal treatments may improve the efficacy of the laser procedure.Clinical studies with a higher number of patients should be performed to confirm the results.Funding: This trial was sponsored by Fotona d.o.o., manufacturer of the laser device used in the trial.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Canadian Urological Association Journal
Published
2024-09-05
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5489/cuaj.8971
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Pelvic floor disorders treatments
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.47

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

NS-AUA 2024 Annual Meeting Abstracts – Female Urology, Incontinence

Editor CUAJ
1 citations
Canadian Urological Association Journal
Pelvic floor disorders treatments
0.47
article

NS-AUA 2024 Annual Meeting Abstracts – Female Urology, Incontinence

Editor CUAJ
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Introduction: Stress urinary incontinence (SUI) includes loss of urethral support and intrinsic sphincter deficiency (ISD).We aimed to enhance SUI by integrating intraurethral (IU) with intravaginal (IV) non-ablative Er: YAG laser therapy.The primary objective was to evaluate the safety of IU+IV laser therapy for SUI with ISD components and compare it to IV only and sham through six-and 12-month followups.The secondary objective was to assess the efficacy of the IU+IV and IV-only treatments compared to sham.Methods: Women with proven SUI with a degree of ISD were randomized into IU+IV laser treatment (n=20), IV laser treatment (n=20), and sham control (n=15).The sham subjects were offered the active treatment after a six-month followup.Subjects in both active groups were followed out to 12 months post-treatment.Tolerability and safety were assessed by VAS pain scale, recording of adverse events (AE), and measuring uroflow and post-void residual (PVR).Secondary effectiveness endpoints were assessed by 24-hour pad test, three-day voiding diary, and ICIQ-UI SF and PGI-I questionnaires. Results:We randomized 55 patients into three groups, and 53 patients completed the trial.Thirty-nine adverse events (AEs) were recorded in 23 patients.Seventeen of the 39 recorded AEs were probably related or related to the procedure.Mean (SD) duration of the AEs was 2.93 (3.2) days.The PVR results revealed no clinically meaningful differences between groups (p=0.49), the same as for voiding symptoms at six (p=0.19) or 12 months (p=0.76).At six-month and 12-month followup, >50% reduction of 24-hour pad weight was observed in 64.7% (55.6%) of patients in the IU+IV group, 36.8% (58.8%) in the IV group, and 33.3% in the sham group.The odds of observing a >50% reduction of 24-hour pad weight at six months increased by 246% in the IV+IU arm compared to IV (OR=3.46[0.89-14.9];p=0.08).Conclusions: The addition of the intraurethral treatment did not result in a higher incidence of AEs.In patients with a degree of ISD, combining intraurethral and intravaginal treatments may improve the efficacy of the laser procedure.Clinical studies with a higher number of patients should be performed to confirm the results.Funding: This trial was sponsored by Fotona d.o.o., manufacturer of the laser device used in the trial.

Canadian Urological Association JournalVol. 18(9S3)
Eli Lilly and Company, Ironwood Pharmaceuticals, Incorporated, Nevro, H. Lundbeck A/S, National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases
Gender equality
Openalex Percentile: Top 32%
Pelvic floor disorders treatments
0.47
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.