A Test of Fama-French Five-Factor Model in Quantitative Easing

In the evolving context of financial markets, the global financial crisis and subsequent quantitative easing policies have reignited scrutiny of the effectiveness of asset pricing models. This study employs the Fama-French methodology to conduct a detailed analysis of data from July 1963 to January 2024, a period encompassing significant economic shifts, to evaluate the robustness of the Fama-French three-factor and five-factor models under different market conditions. By examining five key factors—market excess returns, size premium, value premium, profitability, and investment style—across various time frames, the research seeks to identify the efficacy of these models in explaining stock returns during quantitative easing policies. The findings reveal variations in the explanatory power of these models across different market cycles. This study underscores the importance of incorporating additional risk factors to accurately capture the complexities of financial markets, especially during pivotal economic policy periods. However, it also recognizes the limitations imposed by the exclusion of data, potentially overlooking specific market dynamics crucial for understanding the impacts of the financial crisis and quantitative easing. By expanding the understanding of classic asset pricing models within the contemporary financial markets and shedding light on market dynamics under quantitative easing, this research not only provides valuable insights but also sets a direction for future exploration in financial market analysis and asset pricing model development.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Highlights in Business Economics and Management
Published
2024-09-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.54097/6722e485
Primary Topic
Financial Markets and Investment Strategies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A Test of Fama-French Five-Factor Model in Quantitative Easing

Yanting Li
Highlights in Business Economics and Management
Financial Markets and Investment Strategies
article

A Test of Fama-French Five-Factor Model in Quantitative Easing

Yanting Li
article en

Abstract

In the evolving context of financial markets, the global financial crisis and subsequent quantitative easing policies have reignited scrutiny of the effectiveness of asset pricing models. This study employs the Fama-French methodology to conduct a detailed analysis of data from July 1963 to January 2024, a period encompassing significant economic shifts, to evaluate the robustness of the Fama-French three-factor and five-factor models under different market conditions. By examining five key factors—market excess returns, size premium, value premium, profitability, and investment style—across various time frames, the research seeks to identify the efficacy of these models in explaining stock returns during quantitative easing policies. The findings reveal variations in the explanatory power of these models across different market cycles. This study underscores the importance of incorporating additional risk factors to accurately capture the complexities of financial markets, especially during pivotal economic policy periods. However, it also recognizes the limitations imposed by the exclusion of data, potentially overlooking specific market dynamics crucial for understanding the impacts of the financial crisis and quantitative easing. By expanding the understanding of classic asset pricing models within the contemporary financial markets and shedding light on market dynamics under quantitative easing, this research not only provides valuable insights but also sets a direction for future exploration in financial market analysis and asset pricing model development.

Highlights in Business Economics and ManagementVol. 40
The University of Sydney (AU)
Openalex Percentile: Top 80%
Financial Markets and Investment Strategies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.