New covering techniques and applications utilizing multigranulation fuzzy rough sets

Abstract In order to conduct an in-depth study of Zhan’s methodology pertaining to the covering of multigranulation fuzzy rough sets ( $$\hbox {C}_{{MG}}$$ <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mml:msub> <mml:mtext>C</mml:mtext> <mml:mrow> <mml:mi>MG</mml:mi> </mml:mrow> </mml:msub> </mml:math> FRSs), we build two families: the family of fuzzy $$\beta $$ <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mml:mi>β</mml:mi> </mml:math> -minimum descriptions and the family of $$\beta $$ <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mml:mi>β</mml:mi> </mml:math> -maximum descriptions. Subsequently, utilizing these notions, we proceed to develop two variations of covering via optimistic (pessimistic) multigranuation rough set samples ( $$\hbox {CO(P)}_{{MG}}$$ <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mml:msub> <mml:mtext>CO(P)</mml:mtext> <mml:mrow> <mml:mi>MG</mml:mi> </mml:mrow> </mml:msub> </mml:math> FRS). The axiomatic properties are examined. In this study, we examine four models of covering using variable precision multigranulation fuzzy rough sets ( $$\hbox {CVP}_{{MG}}$$ <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mml:msub> <mml:mtext>CVP</mml:mtext> <mml:mrow> <mml:mi>MG</mml:mi> </mml:mrow> </mml:msub> </mml:math> FRSs). We proceed with analyzing the features of these models. Interconnections between these planned plans are also elucidated. This study explores algorithms that aim to identify innovative strategies for addressing multiattribute group decision-making problems (MAGDM) and multicriteria group decision-making problems (MCGDM). The test examples have been elucidated to provide an inclusive grasp of the efficacy of the offered samples. Ultimately, the distinctions between our methodologies and the preexisting research have been demonstrated.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Artificial Intelligence Review
Published
2024-09-06
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10462-024-10860-w
Citations
7
Primary Topic
Rough Sets and Fuzzy Logic
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.53

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

New covering techniques and applications utilizing multigranulation fuzzy rough sets

Mohammed Atef, Sarbast Moslem, Sifeng Liu, Dragan Pamucar
7 citations
Artificial Intelligence Review
Rough Sets and Fuzzy Logic
2.53
article

New covering techniques and applications utilizing multigranulation fuzzy rough sets

Mohammed Atef, Sarbast Moslem, Sifeng Liu, Dragan Pamucar
article en
7 citations

Abstract

Abstract In order to conduct an in-depth study of Zhan’s methodology pertaining to the covering of multigranulation fuzzy rough sets ( $$\hbox {C}_{{MG}}$$ <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mml:msub> <mml:mtext>C</mml:mtext> <mml:mrow> <mml:mi>MG</mml:mi> </mml:mrow> </mml:msub> </mml:math> FRSs), we build two families: the family of fuzzy $$\beta $$ <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mml:mi>β</mml:mi> </mml:math> -minimum descriptions and the family of $$\beta $$ <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mml:mi>β</mml:mi> </mml:math> -maximum descriptions. Subsequently, utilizing these notions, we proceed to develop two variations of covering via optimistic (pessimistic) multigranuation rough set samples ( $$\hbox {CO(P)}_{{MG}}$$ <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mml:msub> <mml:mtext>CO(P)</mml:mtext> <mml:mrow> <mml:mi>MG</mml:mi> </mml:mrow> </mml:msub> </mml:math> FRS). The axiomatic properties are examined. In this study, we examine four models of covering using variable precision multigranulation fuzzy rough sets ( $$\hbox {CVP}_{{MG}}$$ <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mml:msub> <mml:mtext>CVP</mml:mtext> <mml:mrow> <mml:mi>MG</mml:mi> </mml:mrow> </mml:msub> </mml:math> FRSs). We proceed with analyzing the features of these models. Interconnections between these planned plans are also elucidated. This study explores algorithms that aim to identify innovative strategies for addressing multiattribute group decision-making problems (MAGDM) and multicriteria group decision-making problems (MCGDM). The test examples have been elucidated to provide an inclusive grasp of the efficacy of the offered samples. Ultimately, the distinctions between our methodologies and the preexisting research have been demonstrated.

Artificial Intelligence ReviewVol. 57(10)
University College Dublin (IE), Northwestern Polytechnical University (CN), Western Caspian University (AZ), University of Belgrade (RS), Menoufia University (EG), Nanjing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics (CN), Yuan Ze University (TW)
University College Dublin
Openalex Percentile: Top 9%
Rough Sets and Fuzzy Logic
2.53
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.