Comparison of the Performance of the M&S Method of the Liquid Propellant Supply System

In the process of designing the supply system for engines using liquid propellant, Modeling and Simulation (M&S) is essential.M&S enables time and cost savings in development, making it one of the important components in the design process.Therefore, evaluating the performance of M&S methods beforehand is essential as it may lead to differences in the design process and duration depending on the methods used.In this study, an analysis was conducted according to the M&S methods, and the performance and efficiency were evaluated.The method of characteristic and commercial software were utilized for M&S, and water supply tests were conducted to validate the analysis results.The validation results showed that both results were similar to the experiments under all test conditions, and ultimately, the performance of the M&S methods was confirmed by comparing the two results. (M&S) .M&S . M&S . M&S . M&S . , M&S .

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of the Korean Society of Propulsion Engineers
Published
2024-08-31
DOI
https://doi.org/10.6108/kspe.2024.28.4.084
Primary Topic
Spacecraft and Cryogenic Technologies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparison of the Performance of the M&S Method of the Liquid Propellant Supply System

Hyoung Jin Lee, Tae‐Seong Roh, Hye In Kim, Ji Hoe Seo
Journal of the Korean Society of Propulsion Engineers
Spacecraft and Cryogenic Technologies
article

Comparison of the Performance of the M&S Method of the Liquid Propellant Supply System

Hyoung Jin Lee, Tae‐Seong Roh, Hye In Kim, Ji Hoe Seo
article en

Abstract

In the process of designing the supply system for engines using liquid propellant, Modeling and Simulation (M&S) is essential.M&S enables time and cost savings in development, making it one of the important components in the design process.Therefore, evaluating the performance of M&S methods beforehand is essential as it may lead to differences in the design process and duration depending on the methods used.In this study, an analysis was conducted according to the M&S methods, and the performance and efficiency were evaluated.The method of characteristic and commercial software were utilized for M&S, and water supply tests were conducted to validate the analysis results.The validation results showed that both results were similar to the experiments under all test conditions, and ultimately, the performance of the M&S methods was confirmed by comparing the two results. (M&S) .M&S . M&S . M&S . M&S . , M&S .

Journal of the Korean Society of Propulsion EngineersVol. 28(4)
Inha University (KR)
Affordable and clean energy
Openalex Percentile: Top 77%
Spacecraft and Cryogenic Technologies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.