Oxygen In The Mix: Is Oxic Microbial Electrosynthesis A Potential Alternative For Biomass Production?

Abstract Oxic microbial electrosynthesis (oMES) allows the utilization of renewable electricity and industrial gas streams containing CO 2 and O 2 for biomass production by cultivating aerobic, autotrophic, hydrogen‐oxidizing bacteria, commonly known as Knallgas bacteria. oMES is likely not a direct competitor to conventional anoxic microbial electrosynthesis as harnessing aerobic hydrogen‐oxidizing bacteria depends on energetically inefficient assimilatory CO 2 reduction pathways. However, it might be a complementary approach to classical biomass production from the perspective of limited land use and the availability of cheap renewable energy. The best characterized Knallgas bacterium is Cupriavidus necator . Extensively studied as lithoautotrophic production host, C. necator already offers a broad arsenal of genetic tools. In contrast, mechanistical knowledge about the recently discovered Kyrpidia spormannii is limited, but this species shows remarkable growth when cultivated as cathodic biofilm in bioelectrochemical systems. In addition, first experiments indicate a low energy demand for biomass production, which is in the order of magnitude of gas fermentation with C. necator or heterotrophic and methanotrophic technologies. Still, many aspects of the electrochemical cultivation of K. spormannii need to be better understood and rigorously improved to be a competitive technology in the making, including electron transfer and microbial kinetics, cultivation conditions, mass and energy balances, and reactor design.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
ChemElectroChem
Published
2024-09-06
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/celc.202400397
Citations
4
Primary Topic
Microbial Fuel Cells and Bioremediation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.82

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Oxygen In The Mix: Is Oxic Microbial Electrosynthesis A Potential Alternative For Biomass Production?

Benjamin Korth, Miriam Edel, Johannes Eberhard Reiner
4 citations
ChemElectroChem
Microbial Fuel Cells and Bioremediation
0.82
article

Oxygen In The Mix: Is Oxic Microbial Electrosynthesis A Potential Alternative For Biomass Production?

Benjamin Korth, Miriam Edel, Johannes Eberhard Reiner
article en
4 citations

Abstract

Abstract Oxic microbial electrosynthesis (oMES) allows the utilization of renewable electricity and industrial gas streams containing CO 2 and O 2 for biomass production by cultivating aerobic, autotrophic, hydrogen‐oxidizing bacteria, commonly known as Knallgas bacteria. oMES is likely not a direct competitor to conventional anoxic microbial electrosynthesis as harnessing aerobic hydrogen‐oxidizing bacteria depends on energetically inefficient assimilatory CO 2 reduction pathways. However, it might be a complementary approach to classical biomass production from the perspective of limited land use and the availability of cheap renewable energy. The best characterized Knallgas bacterium is Cupriavidus necator . Extensively studied as lithoautotrophic production host, C. necator already offers a broad arsenal of genetic tools. In contrast, mechanistical knowledge about the recently discovered Kyrpidia spormannii is limited, but this species shows remarkable growth when cultivated as cathodic biofilm in bioelectrochemical systems. In addition, first experiments indicate a low energy demand for biomass production, which is in the order of magnitude of gas fermentation with C. necator or heterotrophic and methanotrophic technologies. Still, many aspects of the electrochemical cultivation of K. spormannii need to be better understood and rigorously improved to be a competitive technology in the making, including electron transfer and microbial kinetics, cultivation conditions, mass and energy balances, and reactor design.

ChemElectroChemVol. 11(20)
Helmholtz Centre for Environmental Research (DE), Universität Hamburg (DE), Aarhus University (DK), Novo Nordisk Foundation (DK), Hamburg University of Technology (DE)
Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft
Affordable and clean energy
Openalex Percentile: Top 31%
Microbial Fuel Cells and Bioremediation
0.82
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.