Examination of the effectiveness of ward tribunals in mediating land disputes in Tanzania: A case study of Kibaha District Council

Tanzania has established a separate system for dealing with land disputes, which is less formal than ordinary civil courts and more accessible to citizens with less formal education. The Village Land Act and the Land Dispute Courts Act provide the institutional framework for land dispute settlement, including the Ward Tribunal, District Land and Housing Tribunal, High Court, and Court of Appeal of Tanzania. Ward Tribunals are established by the Ward Tribunal Act in 1985 to secure peace and harmony in their areas by obtaining justice and amicable settlement of land disputes. However, some cases have been decided without considering customary principles of mediation, as seen in Cosmas Matimila v John Cosmas Matimilia and Fredrick Leonald v Ezekiel Maganga. This study aims to examine the effectiveness of Ward Tribunals in dealing with land disputes in Tanzania through the application of customary principles of mediation using Kibaha District as a case study. The research methodology was a qualitative approach, employing documentary and field research methodologies, primary and secondary sources of data, and non-probability sampling. A sample size of fifteen respondents was selected, including seven respondents from Kibaha District Ward Tribunals, five respondents from mediation practitioners and experts, and five respondents who was beneficiaries of mediation through customary principle from Kibaha District. The data analysis was content analysis, interpreting canons of statutory interpretation, including inductive reasoning and deductive reasoning. The Findings of this study shows that; l that although Ward tribunals are very important in disputes mediations through customarily principles face ineffective application in land disputes mediations in Tanzanian context. The study recommends deliberate intervention by the judiciary system to ensure enforceability of customarily principles in land disputes mediations.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Science and Research Archive
Published
2024-09-06
DOI
https://doi.org/10.30574/ijsra.2024.13.1.1531
Primary Topic
Land Rights and Reforms
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Examination of the effectiveness of ward tribunals in mediating land disputes in Tanzania: A case study of Kibaha District Council

Benedict Thomas Mapunda, Ruti Johnson Mwamfupe, Cornel K inanila Mtaki
International Journal of Science and Research Archive
Land Rights and Reforms
article

Examination of the effectiveness of ward tribunals in mediating land disputes in Tanzania: A case study of Kibaha District Council

Benedict Thomas Mapunda, Ruti Johnson Mwamfupe, Cornel K inanila Mtaki
article en

Abstract

Tanzania has established a separate system for dealing with land disputes, which is less formal than ordinary civil courts and more accessible to citizens with less formal education. The Village Land Act and the Land Dispute Courts Act provide the institutional framework for land dispute settlement, including the Ward Tribunal, District Land and Housing Tribunal, High Court, and Court of Appeal of Tanzania. Ward Tribunals are established by the Ward Tribunal Act in 1985 to secure peace and harmony in their areas by obtaining justice and amicable settlement of land disputes. However, some cases have been decided without considering customary principles of mediation, as seen in Cosmas Matimila v John Cosmas Matimilia and Fredrick Leonald v Ezekiel Maganga. This study aims to examine the effectiveness of Ward Tribunals in dealing with land disputes in Tanzania through the application of customary principles of mediation using Kibaha District as a case study. The research methodology was a qualitative approach, employing documentary and field research methodologies, primary and secondary sources of data, and non-probability sampling. A sample size of fifteen respondents was selected, including seven respondents from Kibaha District Ward Tribunals, five respondents from mediation practitioners and experts, and five respondents who was beneficiaries of mediation through customary principle from Kibaha District. The data analysis was content analysis, interpreting canons of statutory interpretation, including inductive reasoning and deductive reasoning. The Findings of this study shows that; l that although Ward tribunals are very important in disputes mediations through customarily principles face ineffective application in land disputes mediations in Tanzanian context. The study recommends deliberate intervention by the judiciary system to ensure enforceability of customarily principles in land disputes mediations.

International Journal of Science and Research ArchiveVol. 13(1)
Tumaini University (TZ)
Openalex Percentile: Top 80%
Land Rights and Reforms
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.