Hegel and the Ought

Abstract: It is often assumed that Hegel is opposed to "the ought" because he privileges actuality over and against what merely ought to be and what is merely possible. In this paper, the author argues that, far from denying or dismissing their existence, the ought and unactual possibility are ineliminable parts of his metaphysics as laid out in his Science of Logic . However, although Hegel argues for the existence of the ought and unactual possibility, he also demonstrates why the good itself cannot be captured with these concepts alone. His account of the good demonstrates why his metaphysics is open to an ought which is not a mere beyond, and unactual possibility that is not abstract. This in turn allows him to conceive of a metaphysical account of the good that surpasses these categories by framing the good in terms of actuality and truth.