Predicting soil loss in small watersheds under different emission scenarios from CMIP6 using random forests

Abstract Soil loss is a common land degradation process worldwide, which is impacted by land use and climate change. In this study, random forests (RF) were first used to establish a soil loss model at the scale of a small watershed in the hilly‐gully region of the Loess Plateau based on the field observation data. Subsequently, the model was used to predict soil loss in the Chabagou watershed under the historical (1990–2020) and future emission scenarios, namely SSP1–2.6 (low‐emission), SSP2–4.5 (medium‐emission) and SSP5–8.5 (high‐emission) (2030–2,100) from the Coupled Model Intercomparison Project Phases 6 (CMIP6). In the RF model, the coefficient of determination (R 2 ) and Nash‐Sutcliffe coefficient of efficiency (NS) were both greater than 0.86, and the RMSE‐observations standard deviation ratio (RSR) was less than 0.36. Additionally, the RF‐based model had higher simulation accuracy and robustness than those of the previous soil loss models, indicating its potential for wider applications in simulating soil loss. Compared with soil loss between 1990 and 1999, climate change led to a 35.36% increase in soil loss, while land use change resulted in an 11.13% reduction from 2000 to 2020 in the Chabagou watershed. This reveals that the current land use management could not effectively counterbalance the soil loss caused by rainstorms. Furthermore, compared with the historical period (1990–2020), under SSP1–2.6, SSP2–4.5 and SSP5–8.5 (2030–2,100), the soil loss rates without land use change would be increased by 6.01%, 19.11% and 35.35%, while the soil loss rates with land use change would be changed by −5.88%, +4.41% and +19.12%, respectively. These results help to provide a scientific basis for enhancing the capacity to respond to climate change and mitigation of soil and water loss on the Loess Plateau.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Earth Surface Processes and Landforms
Published
2024-09-06
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/esp.5980
Citations
5
Primary Topic
Soil erosion and sediment transport
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.67

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Predicting soil loss in small watersheds under different emission scenarios from CMIP6 using random forests

Jiaxi Wang, Juying Jiao, Leichao Bai, Nan Wang et al.
5 citations
Earth Surface Processes and Landforms
Soil erosion and sediment transport
1.67
article

Predicting soil loss in small watersheds under different emission scenarios from CMIP6 using random forests

Jiaxi Wang, Juying Jiao, Leichao Bai, Nan Wang, Yue Liang, Ziqi Zhang, Jianjun Li, Qian Xu, Yulan Chen, Zhixin Zhang, Yanhong Wei
article en
5 citations

Abstract

Abstract Soil loss is a common land degradation process worldwide, which is impacted by land use and climate change. In this study, random forests (RF) were first used to establish a soil loss model at the scale of a small watershed in the hilly‐gully region of the Loess Plateau based on the field observation data. Subsequently, the model was used to predict soil loss in the Chabagou watershed under the historical (1990–2020) and future emission scenarios, namely SSP1–2.6 (low‐emission), SSP2–4.5 (medium‐emission) and SSP5–8.5 (high‐emission) (2030–2,100) from the Coupled Model Intercomparison Project Phases 6 (CMIP6). In the RF model, the coefficient of determination (R 2 ) and Nash‐Sutcliffe coefficient of efficiency (NS) were both greater than 0.86, and the RMSE‐observations standard deviation ratio (RSR) was less than 0.36. Additionally, the RF‐based model had higher simulation accuracy and robustness than those of the previous soil loss models, indicating its potential for wider applications in simulating soil loss. Compared with soil loss between 1990 and 1999, climate change led to a 35.36% increase in soil loss, while land use change resulted in an 11.13% reduction from 2000 to 2020 in the Chabagou watershed. This reveals that the current land use management could not effectively counterbalance the soil loss caused by rainstorms. Furthermore, compared with the historical period (1990–2020), under SSP1–2.6, SSP2–4.5 and SSP5–8.5 (2030–2,100), the soil loss rates without land use change would be increased by 6.01%, 19.11% and 35.35%, while the soil loss rates with land use change would be changed by −5.88%, +4.41% and +19.12%, respectively. These results help to provide a scientific basis for enhancing the capacity to respond to climate change and mitigation of soil and water loss on the Loess Plateau.

Earth Surface Processes and LandformsVol. 49(13)
China West Normal University (CN), Guizhou University (CN), China Institute of Water Resources and Hydropower Research (CN), Guangdong Academy of Sciences (CN), Institute of Soil and Water Conservation (CN), Ningxia Water Conservancy (CN)
National Natural Science Foundation of China
Openalex Percentile: Top 16%
Soil erosion and sediment transport
1.67
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.