A Broad Understanding of Peace as a Foundation for Approaching Education for Peace

The aim of this article is to show the most important implications of a broad understanding of peace for thinking about peace education. In the first part of my reflections, I recall the narrow definition of peace, which has its roots in antiquity. I point out that it is inadequate for complex peace processes, and I recall selected traditions of a broad understanding of peace. I also point out the most important tendencies in contemporary reflection on peace, highlighting the polysemantic nature of the concept of “peace” and the multifaceted and dynamic nature of peace processes. In the second part of the article, I list and discuss the most important implications of such a broad understanding of peace for thinking about education for peace. These are: the need to appreciate the role of education in building peace and to recognize it as a factor that is just as important as the actions of politicians and world leaders; the need to think about education for peace in an open way, always incomplete and permanently embedded in human education; and the recognition that the fundamental mission of education for peace is to develop in people a sense of subjectivity, personal responsibility for peace and a sense of responsibility for peace.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Forum Pedagogiczne
Published
2024-09-06
DOI
https://doi.org/10.21697/fp.2024.2.2.2
Primary Topic
Peace and Human Rights Education
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A Broad Understanding of Peace as a Foundation for Approaching Education for Peace

Agnieszka Piejka
Forum Pedagogiczne
Peace and Human Rights Education
article

A Broad Understanding of Peace as a Foundation for Approaching Education for Peace

Agnieszka Piejka
article en

Abstract

The aim of this article is to show the most important implications of a broad understanding of peace for thinking about peace education. In the first part of my reflections, I recall the narrow definition of peace, which has its roots in antiquity. I point out that it is inadequate for complex peace processes, and I recall selected traditions of a broad understanding of peace. I also point out the most important tendencies in contemporary reflection on peace, highlighting the polysemantic nature of the concept of “peace” and the multifaceted and dynamic nature of peace processes. In the second part of the article, I list and discuss the most important implications of such a broad understanding of peace for thinking about education for peace. These are: the need to appreciate the role of education in building peace and to recognize it as a factor that is just as important as the actions of politicians and world leaders; the need to think about education for peace in an open way, always incomplete and permanently embedded in human education; and the recognition that the fundamental mission of education for peace is to develop in people a sense of subjectivity, personal responsibility for peace and a sense of responsibility for peace.

Forum PedagogiczneVol. 14(2.2)
Openalex Percentile: Top 76%
Peace and Human Rights Education
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.