A conceptual and ethical framework for empathy and communication technologies

While there is an interest in questions related to empathy and communication technologies (CTs) in various disciplines, conceptual and ethical ambiguities on what empathy exactly is and whether and how it can be shaped by technologies make it unclear how to approach such questions. This paper sets out to provide such a framework: a way to understand empathy and its relationship to CTs in a conceptually and ethically robust manner. A critical reconsideration of the concept is needed, especially if we want to use the concept to evaluate technologies and their impact in terms of desirability and guidance to shape our future. I argue we need to understand empathy explicitly as a moral concept that is contextually situated, relational, and diverse, and to do so, I argue to understand empathy as a virtue. Section 2 lays down the theoretical foundation to explore empathy as a virtue, technological mediation, and CTs. In section 3, I apply these concepts to identify different ways in which CTs can mediate empathy and change what it means to be empathetic on both individual and societal levels. This multi-layered understanding of “CT-mediated empathy” provides a lens through which questions on CTs and empathy can be approached, such that we can reflect on, evaluate and improve specific technologies, their implementation, and their use. In section 4, I summarize this in a list of seven questions that require reflection in the design and implementation of a (new) CT. The paper ends with some forward-looking implications and recommendations for design, research, education, and policy towards an empathetic sociotechnical future. • Ambiguities and incongruencies on what empathy is confuse questions on empathy and CTs. • Empathy can be understood as a virtue in between the vices proximism and distantism. • This account of empathy is combined with mediation theory to analyse the impact of CTs. • CTs can shape empathy both at an individual and societal level in various ways. • A 7-point framework is developed to approach questions regarding empathy and CTs.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Technology in Society
Published
2024-09-06
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techsoc.2024.102707
Citations
6
Primary Topic
Innovative Human-Technology Interaction
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.23

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A conceptual and ethical framework for empathy and communication technologies

Caroline Bollen
6 citations
Technology in Society
Innovative Human-Technology Interaction
2.23
article

A conceptual and ethical framework for empathy and communication technologies

Caroline Bollen
article en
6 citations

Abstract

While there is an interest in questions related to empathy and communication technologies (CTs) in various disciplines, conceptual and ethical ambiguities on what empathy exactly is and whether and how it can be shaped by technologies make it unclear how to approach such questions. This paper sets out to provide such a framework: a way to understand empathy and its relationship to CTs in a conceptually and ethically robust manner. A critical reconsideration of the concept is needed, especially if we want to use the concept to evaluate technologies and their impact in terms of desirability and guidance to shape our future. I argue we need to understand empathy explicitly as a moral concept that is contextually situated, relational, and diverse, and to do so, I argue to understand empathy as a virtue. Section 2 lays down the theoretical foundation to explore empathy as a virtue, technological mediation, and CTs. In section 3, I apply these concepts to identify different ways in which CTs can mediate empathy and change what it means to be empathetic on both individual and societal levels. This multi-layered understanding of “CT-mediated empathy” provides a lens through which questions on CTs and empathy can be approached, such that we can reflect on, evaluate and improve specific technologies, their implementation, and their use. In section 4, I summarize this in a list of seven questions that require reflection in the design and implementation of a (new) CT. The paper ends with some forward-looking implications and recommendations for design, research, education, and policy towards an empathetic sociotechnical future. • Ambiguities and incongruencies on what empathy is confuse questions on empathy and CTs. • Empathy can be understood as a virtue in between the vices proximism and distantism. • This account of empathy is combined with mediation theory to analyse the impact of CTs. • CTs can shape empathy both at an individual and societal level in various ways. • A 7-point framework is developed to approach questions regarding empathy and CTs.

Technology in SocietyVol. 79
Delft University of Technology (NL)
Nederlandse Organisatie voor Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 12%
Innovative Human-Technology Interaction
2.23
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.