Generative tools of AI in education

Since generative tools of Artificial Intelligence appeared in education, ongoing discussion arose. Still, higher education institutions argue if generative tools can be used, and if yes, what exactly can be accepted. The purpose of this study is to investigate for what exactly students use the generative tool Chat GPT in their studies, as well as to determine if there is a statistically significant difference between students representing different fields of study in terms of usage of Chat GPT in general, as well as in evaluation of the knowledge. The objectives of the study are to research recent scientific findings, as well as to analyze the results of the survey created by authors, which was distributed in Latvia, Lithuania, Ukraine, Bulgaria and Uzbekistan. Methods of the study are analysis of the recent findings and statistical analysis of the survey. To test hypotheses, the authors employed the Kruscal-Wallis non-parametric test for both hypotheses, where authors tested if there are statistically significant differences between answers of students from different education fields. The final results highlight the use of Chat GPT by students in higher education.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Business and management
Published
2024-09-06
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3846/bm.2024.1241
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Online Learning and Analytics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.41
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Generative tools of AI in education

Jūlija Mironova, Olga Verdenhofa, A. N. Bondarenko, Remigijus Kinderis et al.
1 citations
Business and management
Online Learning and Analytics
0.41
article

Generative tools of AI in education

Jūlija Mironova, Olga Verdenhofa, A. N. Bondarenko, Remigijus Kinderis, Viktoria Riiascshenko
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Since generative tools of Artificial Intelligence appeared in education, ongoing discussion arose. Still, higher education institutions argue if generative tools can be used, and if yes, what exactly can be accepted. The purpose of this study is to investigate for what exactly students use the generative tool Chat GPT in their studies, as well as to determine if there is a statistically significant difference between students representing different fields of study in terms of usage of Chat GPT in general, as well as in evaluation of the knowledge. The objectives of the study are to research recent scientific findings, as well as to analyze the results of the survey created by authors, which was distributed in Latvia, Lithuania, Ukraine, Bulgaria and Uzbekistan. Methods of the study are analysis of the recent findings and statistical analysis of the survey. To test hypotheses, the authors employed the Kruscal-Wallis non-parametric test for both hypotheses, where authors tested if there are statistically significant differences between answers of students from different education fields. The final results highlight the use of Chat GPT by students in higher education.

Business and management
Klaipėda University (LT), Klaipėdos valstybinė kolegija / Higher Education Institution (LT), ISMA University (LV)
Openalex Percentile: Top 27%
Online Learning and Analytics
0.41
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Generative tools of AI in education — Jūlija Mironova, Olga Verdenhofa, et al. · Business and management (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS