Variation of the labiovelar approximant and the voiced labialized velar fricative in Naukan Yupik

This study reports an analysis of [w] and [ɣʷ] segments in Naukan Yupik that are variants of a single phoneme. The article presents a review of the existing literature on Naukan Yupik and other related languages as well as a primary analysis of modern audio data recorded during field trips on Naukan Yupik documentation in 2022–2023. This analysis deals with such acoustic characteristics as formant structure and frication of the segments [w] and [ɣʷ] as well as voiced velar fricatives [ɣ] and [v]. The results of the analysis confirm differences between [w] and [ɣʷ] that are observed perceptually and distinguish them from [ɣ] and [v]. Our data additionally show that [w] should be considered the main variant of the phoneme in question.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Voprosy Jazykoznanija
Published
2024-09-05
DOI
https://doi.org/10.31857/0373-658x.2024.4.96-120
Primary Topic
Phonetics and Phonology Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Variation of the labiovelar approximant and the voiced labialized velar fricative in Naukan Yupik

Daria O. Zhornik, Elena Budyanskaya, Timofey V. Kornev
Voprosy Jazykoznanija
Phonetics and Phonology Research
article

Variation of the labiovelar approximant and the voiced labialized velar fricative in Naukan Yupik

Daria O. Zhornik, Elena Budyanskaya, Timofey V. Kornev
article en

Abstract

This study reports an analysis of [w] and [ɣʷ] segments in Naukan Yupik that are variants of a single phoneme. The article presents a review of the existing literature on Naukan Yupik and other related languages as well as a primary analysis of modern audio data recorded during field trips on Naukan Yupik documentation in 2022–2023. This analysis deals with such acoustic characteristics as formant structure and frication of the segments [w] and [ɣʷ] as well as voiced velar fricatives [ɣ] and [v]. The results of the analysis confirm differences between [w] and [ɣʷ] that are observed perceptually and distinguish them from [ɣ] and [v]. Our data additionally show that [w] should be considered the main variant of the phoneme in question.

Voprosy Jazykoznanija(4)
Lomonosov Moscow State University (RU), Institute of Linguistics (RU), Moscow State University (TJ)
Openalex Percentile: Top 81%
Phonetics and Phonology Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.