Unraveling genotypic interactions in sugar beet for enhanced yield stability and trait associations

The interaction between genotype and environment (GEI) significantly influences plant performance, crucial for breeding programs and ultimately boosting crop productivity. Alongside GEI, breeders encounter another hurdle in their quest for yield improvement, notably adverse and negative correlations among pivotal traits. This study delved into the stability of white sugar yield (WSY), root yield (RY), sugar content (SC), extraction coefficient of sugar (ECS), and the interplay among essential traits including RY, SC, alpha amino nitrogen (N), sodium (Na<sup>+</sup>), and potassium (K<sup>+</sup>) across 15 sugar beet hybrids and three control varieties. The investigation spanned two locations over two consecutive years (2022-2023), employing a randomized complete block design with four replications to comprehensively analyze these factors. The analysis of variance highlighted the significant effects of environment, genotype, and GEI at the 1% probability level. Notably, the AMMI analysis of GEI revealed the significance of the first component for WSY, RY, and SC, with the first two components proving significant for ECS. Within the linear mixed model (LMM), WSY, RY, SC, and ECS demonstrated significant effects from both genotype and GEI. In the WAASB biplot, genotypes 10, 8, 17, 6, 13, 14, 15, 7, 12, and 16 exhibited stability in WSY, while genotypes 9, 10, 6, 14, 7, 8, 13, 12, 18, and 15 displayed stability in RY. Additionally, genotypes 10, 15, 12, 13, 16, 17, 6, and 14 were stable for SC, and genotypes 8, 10, 7, 6, 13, 12, 16, 17, 15, 14, and 18 showcased stability in ECS, boasting above-average yield values. In the genotype by yield × trait (GYT) biplot, genotypes 15, 18, and 16 emerged as top performers when combining RY with SC, Na<sup>+</sup>, N, and K<sup>+</sup>, suggesting their potential for inclusion in breeding programs.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Scientific Reports
Published
2024-09-06
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-024-71139-2
Citations
5
Primary Topic
Genetics and Plant Breeding
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
3.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Unraveling genotypic interactions in sugar beet for enhanced yield stability and trait associations

Heshmat Omidi, Saeed Sadeghzadeh Hemayati, Amir Mohammad Naji, Mahdi Ramazi
5 citations
Scientific Reports
Genetics and Plant Breeding
3.00
article

Unraveling genotypic interactions in sugar beet for enhanced yield stability and trait associations

Heshmat Omidi, Saeed Sadeghzadeh Hemayati, Amir Mohammad Naji, Mahdi Ramazi
article en
5 citations

Abstract

The interaction between genotype and environment (GEI) significantly influences plant performance, crucial for breeding programs and ultimately boosting crop productivity. Alongside GEI, breeders encounter another hurdle in their quest for yield improvement, notably adverse and negative correlations among pivotal traits. This study delved into the stability of white sugar yield (WSY), root yield (RY), sugar content (SC), extraction coefficient of sugar (ECS), and the interplay among essential traits including RY, SC, alpha amino nitrogen (N), sodium (Na<sup>+</sup>), and potassium (K<sup>+</sup>) across 15 sugar beet hybrids and three control varieties. The investigation spanned two locations over two consecutive years (2022-2023), employing a randomized complete block design with four replications to comprehensively analyze these factors. The analysis of variance highlighted the significant effects of environment, genotype, and GEI at the 1% probability level. Notably, the AMMI analysis of GEI revealed the significance of the first component for WSY, RY, and SC, with the first two components proving significant for ECS. Within the linear mixed model (LMM), WSY, RY, SC, and ECS demonstrated significant effects from both genotype and GEI. In the WAASB biplot, genotypes 10, 8, 17, 6, 13, 14, 15, 7, 12, and 16 exhibited stability in WSY, while genotypes 9, 10, 6, 14, 7, 8, 13, 12, 18, and 15 displayed stability in RY. Additionally, genotypes 10, 15, 12, 13, 16, 17, 6, and 14 were stable for SC, and genotypes 8, 10, 7, 6, 13, 12, 16, 17, 15, 14, and 18 showcased stability in ECS, boasting above-average yield values. In the genotype by yield × trait (GYT) biplot, genotypes 15, 18, and 16 emerged as top performers when combining RY with SC, Na<sup>+</sup>, N, and K<sup>+</sup>, suggesting their potential for inclusion in breeding programs.

Scientific ReportsVol. 14(1)
Shahed University (IR), Agricultural Research & Education Organization (IR)
Zero hunger
Openalex Percentile: Top 9%
Genetics and Plant Breeding
3.00
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.