A parameterization for the correction of ERA5 severe winds for extreme ocean wave modelling

Atmospheric re-analyses are frequently used to force spectral wave models to develop long-term wave datasets. The accuracy of marine surface winds significantly affects the reliability of the modelled wave fields, especially under wave storm conditions. In this study, we employ the spectral wind-wave model WAVEWATCH III (WW3) forced by ERA5 winds to assess their reliability in modelling extreme ocean waves. A one-year wave hindcast of 2010 is simulated and validated against measurements from both in-situ buoy and altimeter data. The results indicate that ERA5 winds underestimate extreme wave conditions for significant wave heights ( H s ) larger than 7.5 m. Accordingly, we present a new wind parameterization, in WW3, that corrects the wind speed bias of ERA5. It has a sigmoid mathematical form showing an exponential growth with a bounded limit of the maximum wind speed to be corrected. The results show that the newly proposed parameterization corrects the negative biases for H s between 7.5 m and 14 m when compared with the wave measurements. The biases are reduced from −0.15 m to negligible values in most of the ocean basins. Other hindcast years were also simulated with WW3 using the new parameterization and the outputs were validated against altimeter data, showing reliable results. This confirms the utility of the new parameterization for extreme ocean wave modelling, which is useful for wide offshore and ocean engineering applications. • The reliability of ERA5 wind fields in modelling extreme ocean waves is assessed. • Negative biases are obtained when modelling extreme waves with H s values exceeding 7.5 m when using ERA5 raw winds. • A parameterization is developed for WAVEWATCH III for bias correction of ERA5 wind speeds to properly model stormy waves. • Wind correction parameters led to negligible biases for the range of H s =7.5-14 m when compared with wave measurements. • The biases were reduced from −0.15 m to negligible values (∼-0.05 m) in the Atlantic Ocean.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Ocean Engineering
Published
2024-09-06
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oceaneng.2024.119048
Citations
10
Primary Topic
Ocean Waves and Remote Sensing
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
4.81
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A parameterization for the correction of ERA5 severe winds for extreme ocean wave modelling

Ahmed I. Elshinnawy, Melisa Menéndez, Raúl Medina
10 citations
Ocean Engineering
Ocean Waves and Remote Sensing
4.81
article

A parameterization for the correction of ERA5 severe winds for extreme ocean wave modelling

Ahmed I. Elshinnawy, Melisa Menéndez, Raúl Medina
article en
10 citations

Abstract

Atmospheric re-analyses are frequently used to force spectral wave models to develop long-term wave datasets. The accuracy of marine surface winds significantly affects the reliability of the modelled wave fields, especially under wave storm conditions. In this study, we employ the spectral wind-wave model WAVEWATCH III (WW3) forced by ERA5 winds to assess their reliability in modelling extreme ocean waves. A one-year wave hindcast of 2010 is simulated and validated against measurements from both in-situ buoy and altimeter data. The results indicate that ERA5 winds underestimate extreme wave conditions for significant wave heights ( H s ) larger than 7.5 m. Accordingly, we present a new wind parameterization, in WW3, that corrects the wind speed bias of ERA5. It has a sigmoid mathematical form showing an exponential growth with a bounded limit of the maximum wind speed to be corrected. The results show that the newly proposed parameterization corrects the negative biases for H s between 7.5 m and 14 m when compared with the wave measurements. The biases are reduced from −0.15 m to negligible values in most of the ocean basins. Other hindcast years were also simulated with WW3 using the new parameterization and the outputs were validated against altimeter data, showing reliable results. This confirms the utility of the new parameterization for extreme ocean wave modelling, which is useful for wide offshore and ocean engineering applications. • The reliability of ERA5 wind fields in modelling extreme ocean waves is assessed. • Negative biases are obtained when modelling extreme waves with H s values exceeding 7.5 m when using ERA5 raw winds. • A parameterization is developed for WAVEWATCH III for bias correction of ERA5 wind speeds to properly model stormy waves. • Wind correction parameters led to negligible biases for the range of H s =7.5-14 m when compared with wave measurements. • The biases were reduced from −0.15 m to negligible values (∼-0.05 m) in the Atlantic Ocean.

Ocean EngineeringVol. 312
Tanta University (EG), Instituto de Física de Cantabria (ES)
Life below water
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Ocean Waves and Remote Sensing
4.81
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.