The Outcomes of the Initial Misclassification of Undifferentiated Hypotension in the Emergency Department: A Prospective Observational Study

<b>Background:</b> Managing shock, a life-threatening emergency, is challenging. The influence of the initial misclassification of undifferentiated hypotension (UH) in the emergency department (ED) on patients' outcomes remains uninvestigated. The aim of this study was to investigate whether the initial misclassification of UH in the ED affects patients' clinical outcomes. <b>Materials and Methods:</b> This prospective observational study enrolled 270 non-traumatic adult patients with UH who had visited the ED of National Taiwan University Hospital between July 2020 and January 2022. The patients were divided into same-diagnosis and different-diagnosis groups, depending on the consistency between the initial and final classifications of shock. The outcome was survival to discharge. The clinical variables, management, and outcomes were compared between the groups. <b>Results:</b> A total of 39 of 270 patients (14.4%) were in the different-diagnosis group. Most misclassified patients were initially diagnosed as having hypovolemic shock (HS, <i>n</i> = 29) but finally diagnosed as having distributive shock (DS, <i>n</i> = 28) or cardiogenic shock (<i>n</i> = 1). When compared with the same-diagnosis group, the different-diagnosis group had higher hospitalization (94.9% vs. 81.4%, <i>p</i> = 0.023) but lower ED discharge (5.1% vs. 16.5%, <i>p</i> = 0.046) rates. Logistic regression analysis showed that the HS initially diagnosed was associated with an increased risk of misclassification (odds ratio [OR] = 14.731, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 3.572-60.749, <i>p</i> < 0.001). However, the survival to discharge did not differ between the two groups. DS, when finally diagnosed instead of the initial misclassification, was associated with in-hospital mortality (OR = 0.317, 95%CI = 0.124-0.810, <i>p</i> = 0.016). <b>Conclusions:</b> The misclassification of UH in the ED is not rare, particularly in patients with DS, who are likely to be initially misdiagnosed with HS. Although misclassification may increase hospitalization and decrease ED discharge, it does not affect survival to discharge.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Clinical Medicine
Published
2024-09-06
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm13175293
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Hemodynamic Monitoring and Therapy
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.57

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Outcomes of the Initial Misclassification of Undifferentiated Hypotension in the Emergency Department: A Prospective Observational Study

Chi‐Sheng Hung, Jr-Jiun Lin, Hooi‐Nee Ong, Chien‐Hua Huang et al.
1 citations
Journal of Clinical Medicine
Hemodynamic Monitoring and Therapy
0.57
article

The Outcomes of the Initial Misclassification of Undifferentiated Hypotension in the Emergency Department: A Prospective Observational Study

Chi‐Sheng Hung, Jr-Jiun Lin, Hooi‐Nee Ong, Chien‐Hua Huang, Wei‐Tien Chang, Min‐Shan Tsai, Wei‐Ting Chen
article en
1 citations

Abstract

<b>Background:</b> Managing shock, a life-threatening emergency, is challenging. The influence of the initial misclassification of undifferentiated hypotension (UH) in the emergency department (ED) on patients' outcomes remains uninvestigated. The aim of this study was to investigate whether the initial misclassification of UH in the ED affects patients' clinical outcomes. <b>Materials and Methods:</b> This prospective observational study enrolled 270 non-traumatic adult patients with UH who had visited the ED of National Taiwan University Hospital between July 2020 and January 2022. The patients were divided into same-diagnosis and different-diagnosis groups, depending on the consistency between the initial and final classifications of shock. The outcome was survival to discharge. The clinical variables, management, and outcomes were compared between the groups. <b>Results:</b> A total of 39 of 270 patients (14.4%) were in the different-diagnosis group. Most misclassified patients were initially diagnosed as having hypovolemic shock (HS, <i>n</i> = 29) but finally diagnosed as having distributive shock (DS, <i>n</i> = 28) or cardiogenic shock (<i>n</i> = 1). When compared with the same-diagnosis group, the different-diagnosis group had higher hospitalization (94.9% vs. 81.4%, <i>p</i> = 0.023) but lower ED discharge (5.1% vs. 16.5%, <i>p</i> = 0.046) rates. Logistic regression analysis showed that the HS initially diagnosed was associated with an increased risk of misclassification (odds ratio [OR] = 14.731, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 3.572-60.749, <i>p</i> < 0.001). However, the survival to discharge did not differ between the two groups. DS, when finally diagnosed instead of the initial misclassification, was associated with in-hospital mortality (OR = 0.317, 95%CI = 0.124-0.810, <i>p</i> = 0.016). <b>Conclusions:</b> The misclassification of UH in the ED is not rare, particularly in patients with DS, who are likely to be initially misdiagnosed with HS. Although misclassification may increase hospitalization and decrease ED discharge, it does not affect survival to discharge.

Journal of Clinical MedicineVol. 13(17)
National Taiwan University Hospital (TW)
National Taiwan University Hospital, National Taiwan University
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 30%
Hemodynamic Monitoring and Therapy
0.57
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.