Robust characterisation of forest structure from airborne laser scanning—A systematic assessment and sample workflow for ecologists

Abstract Forests display tremendous structural diversity, shaping carbon cycling, microclimates and terrestrial habitats. An important tool for forest structure assessments are canopy height models (CHMs): high resolution maps of canopy height obtained using airborne laser scanning (ALS). CHMs are widely used for monitoring canopy dynamics, mapping forest biomass and calibrating satellite products, but surprisingly little is known about how differences between CHM algorithms impact ecological analyses. Here, we used high‐quality ALS data from nine sites in Australia, ranging from semi‐arid shrublands to 90‐m tall Mountain Ash canopies, to comprehensively assess CHM algorithms. This included testing their sensitivity to point cloud degradation and quantifying the propagation of errors to derived metrics of canopy structure. We found that CHM algorithms varied widely both in their height predictions (differences up to 10 m, or 60% of canopy height) and in their sensitivity to point cloud characteristics (biases of up to 5 m, or 40% of canopy height). Impacts of point cloud properties on CHM‐derived metrics varied, from robust inference for height percentiles, to considerable errors in above‐ground biomass estimates (~50 Mg ha −1 , or 10% of total) and high volatility in metrics that quantify spatial associations in canopies (e.g. gaps). However, we also found that two CHM algorithms—a variation on a ‘spikefree’ algorithm that adapts to local pulse densities and a simple Delaunay triangulation of first returns—allowed for robust canopy characterisation and should thus create a secure foundation for ecological comparisons in space and time. We show that CHM choice has a strong impact on forest structural characterisation that has previously been largely overlooked. To address this, we provide a sample workflow to create robust CHMs and best‐practice guidelines to minimise biases and uncertainty in downstream analyses. In doing so, our study paves the way for more rigorous large‐scale assessments of forest structure and dynamics from airborne laser scanning.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Methods in Ecology and Evolution
Published
2024-09-06
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/2041-210x.14416
Citations
22
Primary Topic
Remote Sensing and LiDAR Applications
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
4.53

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Robust characterisation of forest structure from airborne laser scanning—A systematic assessment and sample workflow for ecologists

Grégoire Vincent, Tommaso Jucker, Fabian Jörg Fischer, Toby Jackson
22 citations
Methods in Ecology and Evolution
Remote Sensing and LiDAR Applications
4.53
article

Robust characterisation of forest structure from airborne laser scanning—A systematic assessment and sample workflow for ecologists

Grégoire Vincent, Tommaso Jucker, Fabian Jörg Fischer, Toby Jackson
article en
22 citations

Abstract

Abstract Forests display tremendous structural diversity, shaping carbon cycling, microclimates and terrestrial habitats. An important tool for forest structure assessments are canopy height models (CHMs): high resolution maps of canopy height obtained using airborne laser scanning (ALS). CHMs are widely used for monitoring canopy dynamics, mapping forest biomass and calibrating satellite products, but surprisingly little is known about how differences between CHM algorithms impact ecological analyses. Here, we used high‐quality ALS data from nine sites in Australia, ranging from semi‐arid shrublands to 90‐m tall Mountain Ash canopies, to comprehensively assess CHM algorithms. This included testing their sensitivity to point cloud degradation and quantifying the propagation of errors to derived metrics of canopy structure. We found that CHM algorithms varied widely both in their height predictions (differences up to 10 m, or 60% of canopy height) and in their sensitivity to point cloud characteristics (biases of up to 5 m, or 40% of canopy height). Impacts of point cloud properties on CHM‐derived metrics varied, from robust inference for height percentiles, to considerable errors in above‐ground biomass estimates (~50 Mg ha −1 , or 10% of total) and high volatility in metrics that quantify spatial associations in canopies (e.g. gaps). However, we also found that two CHM algorithms—a variation on a ‘spikefree’ algorithm that adapts to local pulse densities and a simple Delaunay triangulation of first returns—allowed for robust canopy characterisation and should thus create a secure foundation for ecological comparisons in space and time. We show that CHM choice has a strong impact on forest structural characterisation that has previously been largely overlooked. To address this, we provide a sample workflow to create robust CHMs and best‐practice guidelines to minimise biases and uncertainty in downstream analyses. In doing so, our study paves the way for more rigorous large‐scale assessments of forest structure and dynamics from airborne laser scanning.

Methods in Ecology and EvolutionVol. 15(10)
Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (FR), Centre de Coopération Internationale en Recherche Agronomique pour le Développement (FR), Université de Montpellier (FR), University of Cambridge (GB), University of Bristol (GB), Institut National de Recherche pour l'Agriculture, l'Alimentation et l'Environnement (FR), UMR Botanique et Modélisation de l’Architecture des Plantes et des végétations (FR), Conservation Leadership Programme (GB), Institut de Recherche pour le Développement (FR)
Leverhulme Trust, Sight Research UK, Natural Environment Research Council
Life in Land
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Remote Sensing and LiDAR Applications
4.53
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.