Certainly Uncertainty

Abstract: Science museums face the challenge of communicating the inherent uncertainties of science without risking the public’s trust and interest in science. Here, we investigated potential museum visitors’ (N = 466) reception and support for such uncertainty communication by combining an experimental and survey approach as well as quantitative and qualitative data. First, we experimentally manipulated whether historic consensus uncertainty was communicated (a) not at all, (b) incidentally, or (c) explicitly. Uncertainty neither affected visitors’ trust nor interest in the presented information, in a hypothetical exhibition, or in science in general, or their attitudes towards current scientific debates. Second, we asked participants directly about their opinion towards uncertainty communication in science museums, revealing overwhelmingly positive attitudes and 12 times as many statements in support of (vs. against) communicating uncertainty in science exhibitions. These findings suggest that potential museum visitors’ do not only tolerate but actively support uncertainty communication in science museums.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Zeitschrift für Psychologie
Published
2024-09-06
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1027/2151-2604/a000569
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Misinformation and Its Impacts
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.13
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Certainly Uncertainty

Mario Gollwitzer, Marlene Sophie Altenmüller, Kerstin Englhardt, Petra Dengl et al.
1 citations
Zeitschrift für Psychologie
Misinformation and Its Impacts
1.13
article

Certainly Uncertainty

Mario Gollwitzer, Marlene Sophie Altenmüller, Kerstin Englhardt, Petra Dengl, Johannes Stark, Wiebke Henning, Julia Bloemer, Sonja Schlegl
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Abstract: Science museums face the challenge of communicating the inherent uncertainties of science without risking the public’s trust and interest in science. Here, we investigated potential museum visitors’ (N = 466) reception and support for such uncertainty communication by combining an experimental and survey approach as well as quantitative and qualitative data. First, we experimentally manipulated whether historic consensus uncertainty was communicated (a) not at all, (b) incidentally, or (c) explicitly. Uncertainty neither affected visitors’ trust nor interest in the presented information, in a hypothetical exhibition, or in science in general, or their attitudes towards current scientific debates. Second, we asked participants directly about their opinion towards uncertainty communication in science museums, revealing overwhelmingly positive attitudes and 12 times as many statements in support of (vs. against) communicating uncertainty in science exhibitions. These findings suggest that potential museum visitors’ do not only tolerate but actively support uncertainty communication in science museums.

Zeitschrift für PsychologieVol. 233(1)
Kühne Logistics University (DE), Deutsches Museum (DE), Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München (DE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 17%
Misinformation and Its Impacts
1.13
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.