How to Communicate Science to the Public?

Abstract: Communicating research findings to the public in a clear but engaging manner is challenging, yet central for maximizing their societal impact. This systematic review aimed to derive evidence-based strategies for science communication from experimental studies. Three databases were searched in December 2022. Experimental studies published in English or German were included if they tested the effect of providing written information about science to adults aged 16+ years by assessing the impact on at least one of four domains of science communication aims (understanding and knowledge, attitudes and trust, intention and behavior, engagement). A total of 171 publications were included. Derived strategies include avoiding jargon, carefully structuring texts, including citations and expert sources, being mindful about how and when to indicate conflict or uncertainty in science, using neutral language, and highlighting Open Science principles and replicability. They can be used to communicate science effectively to lay audiences, benefitting the society.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Zeitschrift für Psychologie
Published
2024-09-06
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1027/2151-2604/a000572
Citations
12
Primary Topic
Climate Change Communication and Perception
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
13.58
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

How to Communicate Science to the Public?

Marlene Sophie Altenmüller, Oliver Genschow, Melanie Sauerland, Jan Crusius et al.
12 citations
Zeitschrift für Psychologie
Climate Change Communication and Perception
13.58
article

How to Communicate Science to the Public?

Marlene Sophie Altenmüller, Oliver Genschow, Melanie Sauerland, Jan Crusius, Julian Fick, Laura Maria König
article en
12 citations

Abstract

Abstract: Communicating research findings to the public in a clear but engaging manner is challenging, yet central for maximizing their societal impact. This systematic review aimed to derive evidence-based strategies for science communication from experimental studies. Three databases were searched in December 2022. Experimental studies published in English or German were included if they tested the effect of providing written information about science to adults aged 16+ years by assessing the impact on at least one of four domains of science communication aims (understanding and knowledge, attitudes and trust, intention and behavior, engagement). A total of 171 publications were included. Derived strategies include avoiding jargon, carefully structuring texts, including citations and expert sources, being mindful about how and when to indicate conflict or uncertainty in science, using neutral language, and highlighting Open Science principles and replicability. They can be used to communicate science effectively to lay audiences, benefitting the society.

Zeitschrift für PsychologieVol. 233(1)
Leuphana University of Lüneburg (DE), University of Vienna (AT), Maastricht University (NL), Universität Greifswald (DE), University of Bayreuth (DE), Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München (DE), Technische Universität Braunschweig (DE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 1%
Climate Change Communication and Perception
13.58
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.