3D Printing of Biomaterials: Is It Disruptive or Destructive?

3D printing represents a new era in the field of digital manufacturing, finding its applications in many industries, such as healthcare, automotive, and aerospace. In particular, 3D printing has the potential to completely revolutionize the manufacturing process for implants, medical equipment, and even human tissues within the healthcare industry. The rapid rise of 3D printing raises fundamental questions i.e., Is this technology truly revolutionary, or does it perhaps take us in a direction other than we might expect? This editorial aim to consider the dual-edged nature of 3D printing, with particular respect to biomaterials, and argue for a more selective and responsible approach in using it. Furthermore, the importance of regulatory frameworks in ensuring the safety and effectiveness of 3D printing for healthcare applications cannot be overlooked. While such frameworks are well-established in the EU, UK, and USA, they are notably absent in the MENA region.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Biomaterials Connect
Published
2024-09-06
DOI
https://doi.org/10.69709/biomatc.2024.191180
Primary Topic
Additive Manufacturing and 3D Printing Technologies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

3D Printing of Biomaterials: Is It Disruptive or Destructive?

Muhanad M. Hatamleh
Biomaterials Connect
Additive Manufacturing and 3D Printing Technologies
article

3D Printing of Biomaterials: Is It Disruptive or Destructive?

Muhanad M. Hatamleh
article en

Abstract

3D printing represents a new era in the field of digital manufacturing, finding its applications in many industries, such as healthcare, automotive, and aerospace. In particular, 3D printing has the potential to completely revolutionize the manufacturing process for implants, medical equipment, and even human tissues within the healthcare industry. The rapid rise of 3D printing raises fundamental questions i.e., Is this technology truly revolutionary, or does it perhaps take us in a direction other than we might expect? This editorial aim to consider the dual-edged nature of 3D printing, with particular respect to biomaterials, and argue for a more selective and responsible approach in using it. Furthermore, the importance of regulatory frameworks in ensuring the safety and effectiveness of 3D printing for healthcare applications cannot be overlooked. While such frameworks are well-established in the EU, UK, and USA, they are notably absent in the MENA region.

Biomaterials ConnectVol. 1(1)
Jordan University of Science and Technology (JO)
Openalex Percentile: Top 85%
Additive Manufacturing and 3D Printing Technologies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.