Evaluation of Mortality Rate Disparities for Cardiac Arrest Between Urban and Rural Cohorts in the United States Using the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Wide-Ranging Online Data for Epidemiologic Research (CDC WONDER) Database

Introduction The United States includes diverse geographic areas with distinct urban and rural settings. Urban areas served with higher health services and the rural regions with restricted facilities. This disparity results in higher rural mortality rates. Thus, the study uses the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Wide-Ranging Online Data for Epidemiologic Research (CDC WONDER) database to assess the disparities in cardiac arrest mortality rates in urban versus rural areas. Methods This is a retrospective study to assess trends in overall mortality rates for urban versus rural areas in the United States between 1999 and 2020, using the CDC WONDER data for cardiac arrest (ICD-10 CODE I46), extracted on May 25, 2024. Urban/rural classification was based on the Metropolitan 2013 scheme. Statistical analysis was done via RStudio v.4.3.3 and included measures of central tendency, mortality rates per 100,000, and plotting of temporal trends. Results Between 1999 and 2020, the total number of deaths due to cardiac arrest in rural and urban areas was 103,115 and 262,505, respectively. Among the age groups, infants <1 year and elderly >85 years showed a high mortality rate in rural areas compared to urban areas. Gender analysis revealed both males (3.3 per 100,000) and females (3.52 per 100,000) had a high rural mortality rate, compared to urban rates of 1.51 and 1.54 per 100,000, respectively. Racial analysis showed that American Indian or Alaska Native and Asian or Pacific Islander populations had higher mortality in rural areas, with rates of 1.1 and 1.81 per 100,000, respectively, compared to the urban rates of 0.34 and 0.8 per 100,000. Conclusion Trends in mortality rate showed a general decline over time but the gap between urban and rural mortality persists, highlighting the need for continued efforts in rural areas.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Cureus
Published
2024-09-06
DOI
https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.68803
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Cardiac Arrest and Resuscitation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.07
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Evaluation of Mortality Rate Disparities for Cardiac Arrest Between Urban and Rural Cohorts in the United States Using the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Wide-Ranging Online Data for Epidemiologic Research (CDC WONDER) Database

Md. Shamsul Arefin, Amruth A Alluri, Salini Krishnarao Kandhalu, Mousumi Barua et al.
3 citations
Cureus
Cardiac Arrest and Resuscitation
2.07
article

Evaluation of Mortality Rate Disparities for Cardiac Arrest Between Urban and Rural Cohorts in the United States Using the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Wide-Ranging Online Data for Epidemiologic Research (CDC WONDER) Database

Md. Shamsul Arefin, Amruth A Alluri, Salini Krishnarao Kandhalu, Mousumi Barua, Tirth M Patel
article en
3 citations

Abstract

Introduction The United States includes diverse geographic areas with distinct urban and rural settings. Urban areas served with higher health services and the rural regions with restricted facilities. This disparity results in higher rural mortality rates. Thus, the study uses the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Wide-Ranging Online Data for Epidemiologic Research (CDC WONDER) database to assess the disparities in cardiac arrest mortality rates in urban versus rural areas. Methods This is a retrospective study to assess trends in overall mortality rates for urban versus rural areas in the United States between 1999 and 2020, using the CDC WONDER data for cardiac arrest (ICD-10 CODE I46), extracted on May 25, 2024. Urban/rural classification was based on the Metropolitan 2013 scheme. Statistical analysis was done via RStudio v.4.3.3 and included measures of central tendency, mortality rates per 100,000, and plotting of temporal trends. Results Between 1999 and 2020, the total number of deaths due to cardiac arrest in rural and urban areas was 103,115 and 262,505, respectively. Among the age groups, infants <1 year and elderly >85 years showed a high mortality rate in rural areas compared to urban areas. Gender analysis revealed both males (3.3 per 100,000) and females (3.52 per 100,000) had a high rural mortality rate, compared to urban rates of 1.51 and 1.54 per 100,000, respectively. Racial analysis showed that American Indian or Alaska Native and Asian or Pacific Islander populations had higher mortality in rural areas, with rates of 1.1 and 1.81 per 100,000, respectively, compared to the urban rates of 0.34 and 0.8 per 100,000. Conclusion Trends in mortality rate showed a general decline over time but the gap between urban and rural mortality persists, highlighting the need for continued efforts in rural areas.

CureusVol. 16(9)
Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust (GB), Bukovinian State Medical University (UA), Institute of Medical Sciences (IN), University at Buffalo, State University of New York (US), American University of the Caribbean School of Medicine (SX)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 13%
Cardiac Arrest and Resuscitation
2.07
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.