Comparison of one-patch and standard 12-lead electrocardiogram

Pre-connected and positioned patch devices have attempted to simplify the electrocardiogram (ECG) testing process. However, these devices have not been extensively tested and compared with standard ECG systems. The purpose of this study was to compare a novel patch-based ECG device with a standard 12-lead ECG system in order to determine clinical equivalence. Study participants underwent two consecutive ECG tests in a randomized fashion. ECG measurements (heart rate, PR, RR, QRS, QT intervals) were compared between the standard 12-lead ECG and the one-patch ECG. Paired t-test analysis was used for the comparisons conducted using GraphPad Prism. A total of 30 participants underwent the ECG testing (80% female; mean age 35 ± 16 years). One participant presented with first degree AV Block. All other participants were in normal sinus rhythm/sinus arrhythmia. There were no statistically significant differences identified in heart rate, PR interval, RR interval, QRS interval, and QT interval (p > 0.05) between the one-patch ECG and standard 12-lead ECG. These findings suggest that one-patch devices may provide equivalent ECG measurements compared with conventional 12-lead systems. Given the advantages of a one-patch, pre-positioned ECG system, this technology shows promising potential for cardiovascular screening.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Cardiac Arrhythmias
Published
2024-09-06
DOI
https://doi.org/10.24207/jca.v37il.3507
Primary Topic
Cardiac electrophysiology and arrhythmias
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparison of one-patch and standard 12-lead electrocardiogram

Zachary Townsend, Tim Werner
Journal of Cardiac Arrhythmias
Cardiac electrophysiology and arrhythmias
article

Comparison of one-patch and standard 12-lead electrocardiogram

Zachary Townsend, Tim Werner
article en

Abstract

Pre-connected and positioned patch devices have attempted to simplify the electrocardiogram (ECG) testing process. However, these devices have not been extensively tested and compared with standard ECG systems. The purpose of this study was to compare a novel patch-based ECG device with a standard 12-lead ECG system in order to determine clinical equivalence. Study participants underwent two consecutive ECG tests in a randomized fashion. ECG measurements (heart rate, PR, RR, QRS, QT intervals) were compared between the standard 12-lead ECG and the one-patch ECG. Paired t-test analysis was used for the comparisons conducted using GraphPad Prism. A total of 30 participants underwent the ECG testing (80% female; mean age 35 ± 16 years). One participant presented with first degree AV Block. All other participants were in normal sinus rhythm/sinus arrhythmia. There were no statistically significant differences identified in heart rate, PR interval, RR interval, QRS interval, and QT interval (p > 0.05) between the one-patch ECG and standard 12-lead ECG. These findings suggest that one-patch devices may provide equivalent ECG measurements compared with conventional 12-lead systems. Given the advantages of a one-patch, pre-positioned ECG system, this technology shows promising potential for cardiovascular screening.

Journal of Cardiac ArrhythmiasVol. 37
Salisbury University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 73%
Cardiac electrophysiology and arrhythmias
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Comparison of one-patch and standard 12-lead electrocardiogram — Zachary Townsend, Tim Werner · Journal of Cardiac Arrhythmias (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS