Assessment of efficiency of sanitary treatment of technological equipment at meat processing industry enterprise

Introduction. To assess the efficiency of sanitary treatment of technological equipment at the meat processing industry enterprise, the assessment of microbial contamination of technological equipment surfaces after washing and disinfection with subsequent assessment of sensitivity of isolates of microorganisms to the used disinfectant was carried out. Material and methods. Washes from the surfaces of technological equipment were studied at the one of domestic meat-processing enterprises engaged in the production of sausage and semi-finished products from incoming meat raw materials (beef, pork, and poultry meat). Sampling was carried out at various parts of the technological process, including technological line of raw material preparation, sausage production, semi-finished product for the production of meatballs and packaging. Identification of isolated cultures of microorganisms was carried out by time-of-flight mass spectrometry on MALDI-TOF equipment, Bruker Daltonik GmbH. The sensitivity of microorganisms was assessed in relation to the disinfectant based on peracetic acid (PAA) used at the enterprise in working PAA concentrations of 0.02–0.1%. Results. Seventy one microorganism isolates were isolated from the surfaces of technological equipment (42 microorganism isolates after washing and 29 isolates after disinfection). The microflora was represented by 31 species of microorganisms including Gram-positive bacteria – Lactococcus (n = 14), Enterococcus (n = 8), Staphylococcus (n = 7), Kocuria (n = 5), Bacillus (n = 5), Mycrobacterium (n = 2), Pediococcus (n = 1), Lactobacillus (n = 1), Corynebacterium (n = 1), Neisseria (n = 1), Weissella (n = 1); Gram-negative bacteria – Hafnia (n = 4), Escherichia (n = 1), Proteus (n = 1), Pseudomonas (n = 1), Kluyvera (n = 1), Morganella (n = 1), Aeromonas (n = 2); pathogenic bacteria – Listeria (n = 1); actinomycetes – Actinomyces (n = 1), fungi – Candida (n = 11), yeast – Meyerozyma guilliermondii (n = 1). According to the results of evaluation of resistance of microorganism isolates to disinfectant, in the regimes used at the meat processing plant, 33 (46.47 %, 33/71) isolates were found to be resistant to 0.02% PAA, 10 isolates (14.08%, 10/71) to 0.07% PAA, and 6 isolates (8.45%, 6/71) to 0.1% PAA. Limitations. The limitations of the study are related to evaluating the effectiveness of sanitary treatment of technological equipment at the only enterprise of the meat processing industry, other enterprises have not been studied. Conclusion. Disinfection of technological equipment ensures inactivation of the viability of opportunistic and pathogenic microorganisms. However, food spoilage microorganisms were revealed in 46.51% of the wash samples, which dictates the need to develop methodological documents on the management of disinfection measures on technological lines of the food industry with an assessment of efficiency and rotation of disinfectants.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Hygiene and Sanitation
Published
2024-08-31
DOI
https://doi.org/10.47470/0016-9900-2024-103-7-712-717
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Medical Device Sterilization and Disinfection
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.03
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Assessment of efficiency of sanitary treatment of technological equipment at meat processing industry enterprise

Natalya I. Eremeeva, Yu. V. Demina, Anzhelika S. Starikova, Anastasia V. Ilyakova
3 citations
Hygiene and Sanitation
Medical Device Sterilization and Disinfection
1.03
article

Assessment of efficiency of sanitary treatment of technological equipment at meat processing industry enterprise

Natalya I. Eremeeva, Yu. V. Demina, Anzhelika S. Starikova, Anastasia V. Ilyakova
article en
3 citations

Abstract

Introduction. To assess the efficiency of sanitary treatment of technological equipment at the meat processing industry enterprise, the assessment of microbial contamination of technological equipment surfaces after washing and disinfection with subsequent assessment of sensitivity of isolates of microorganisms to the used disinfectant was carried out. Material and methods. Washes from the surfaces of technological equipment were studied at the one of domestic meat-processing enterprises engaged in the production of sausage and semi-finished products from incoming meat raw materials (beef, pork, and poultry meat). Sampling was carried out at various parts of the technological process, including technological line of raw material preparation, sausage production, semi-finished product for the production of meatballs and packaging. Identification of isolated cultures of microorganisms was carried out by time-of-flight mass spectrometry on MALDI-TOF equipment, Bruker Daltonik GmbH. The sensitivity of microorganisms was assessed in relation to the disinfectant based on peracetic acid (PAA) used at the enterprise in working PAA concentrations of 0.02–0.1%. Results. Seventy one microorganism isolates were isolated from the surfaces of technological equipment (42 microorganism isolates after washing and 29 isolates after disinfection). The microflora was represented by 31 species of microorganisms including Gram-positive bacteria – Lactococcus (n = 14), Enterococcus (n = 8), Staphylococcus (n = 7), Kocuria (n = 5), Bacillus (n = 5), Mycrobacterium (n = 2), Pediococcus (n = 1), Lactobacillus (n = 1), Corynebacterium (n = 1), Neisseria (n = 1), Weissella (n = 1); Gram-negative bacteria – Hafnia (n = 4), Escherichia (n = 1), Proteus (n = 1), Pseudomonas (n = 1), Kluyvera (n = 1), Morganella (n = 1), Aeromonas (n = 2); pathogenic bacteria – Listeria (n = 1); actinomycetes – Actinomyces (n = 1), fungi – Candida (n = 11), yeast – Meyerozyma guilliermondii (n = 1). According to the results of evaluation of resistance of microorganism isolates to disinfectant, in the regimes used at the meat processing plant, 33 (46.47 %, 33/71) isolates were found to be resistant to 0.02% PAA, 10 isolates (14.08%, 10/71) to 0.07% PAA, and 6 isolates (8.45%, 6/71) to 0.1% PAA. Limitations. The limitations of the study are related to evaluating the effectiveness of sanitary treatment of technological equipment at the only enterprise of the meat processing industry, other enterprises have not been studied. Conclusion. Disinfection of technological equipment ensures inactivation of the viability of opportunistic and pathogenic microorganisms. However, food spoilage microorganisms were revealed in 46.51% of the wash samples, which dictates the need to develop methodological documents on the management of disinfection measures on technological lines of the food industry with an assessment of efficiency and rotation of disinfectants.

Hygiene and SanitationVol. 103(7)
Russian Medical Academy of Continuous Professional Education (RU), Research Institute of Disinfectology Rospotrebnadzor (RU)
Industry, innovation and infrastructure
Openalex Percentile: Top 24%
Medical Device Sterilization and Disinfection
1.03
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.