Statistical comparison of electron precipitation during auroral breakups occurring either near the open–closed field line boundary or in the central part of the auroral oval

Abstract. Auroral electron precipitation during a substorm exhibits complex spatiotemporal variations which are still not fully understood, especially during the very dynamic phase immediately following the onset. Since during disturbed times, the auroral oval typically extends across several hundreds of kilometres in the latitudinal direction, one may expect that precipitating electron spectra differ at locations close to the open–closed field line boundary (OCB) compared to the central part of the auroral oval. We carry out a statistical study based on 57 auroral breakups associated with substorm onsets observed above Tromsø (66.7° N geomagnetic latitude, i.e. central oval) and 25 onsets occurring above Svalbard (75.4° N geomagnetic latitude, i.e. poleward boundary) between 2015 and 2022. The events were selected based on the availability of both optical observations and field-aligned incoherent scatter radar measurements. Those are two sets of different substorms; hence, we compare solar wind driving conditions and geomagnetic indices for the two event lists in the statistical sense. Using the ELectron SPECtrum (ELSPEC) method (based on the inversion of the electron density profile) on the radar data, we retrieve precipitating electron fluxes within 1–100 keV around each onset time, and we apply the superposed epoch analysis method to the electron spectra at each location. We compare the statistical precipitation characteristics above both sites in terms of the peak differential flux, the energy of the peak, the integrated energy flux, and their time evolution during the minutes following the onset. We find that the integrated energy flux associated with events occurring in the central part of the auroral oval (Tromsø) exhibit a sharp peak of up to 25 mW m−2 in the first 2 min following the auroral breakup before decreasing and maintaining stable values of around 7 mW m−2 for at least 20 min. In turn, no initial peak is seen near the open–closed field line boundary (Svalbard), and values remain low throughout (1–2 mW m−2). A comparison of the median spectra indicates that the precipitating flux of > 10 keV electrons is lower above Svalbard than above Tromsø by a factor of at least 10, which may partly explain the differences. However, it proves difficult to conclude whether the differences originate from the latitude at which the auroral breakup takes place or from the fact that the breakups seen from Svalbard occur Equatorward from the radar beam, which only sees expansion-phase precipitation after a few minutes.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Annales Geophysicae
Published
2024-09-06
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-42-355-2024
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Ionosphere and magnetosphere dynamics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.99

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Statistical comparison of electron precipitation during auroral breakups occurring either near the open–closed field line boundary or in the central part of the auroral oval

Ilkka Virtanen, Maxime Grandin, Noora Partamies
3 citations
Annales Geophysicae
Ionosphere and magnetosphere dynamics
0.99
article

Statistical comparison of electron precipitation during auroral breakups occurring either near the open–closed field line boundary or in the central part of the auroral oval

Ilkka Virtanen, Maxime Grandin, Noora Partamies
article en
3 citations

Abstract

Abstract. Auroral electron precipitation during a substorm exhibits complex spatiotemporal variations which are still not fully understood, especially during the very dynamic phase immediately following the onset. Since during disturbed times, the auroral oval typically extends across several hundreds of kilometres in the latitudinal direction, one may expect that precipitating electron spectra differ at locations close to the open–closed field line boundary (OCB) compared to the central part of the auroral oval. We carry out a statistical study based on 57 auroral breakups associated with substorm onsets observed above Tromsø (66.7° N geomagnetic latitude, i.e. central oval) and 25 onsets occurring above Svalbard (75.4° N geomagnetic latitude, i.e. poleward boundary) between 2015 and 2022. The events were selected based on the availability of both optical observations and field-aligned incoherent scatter radar measurements. Those are two sets of different substorms; hence, we compare solar wind driving conditions and geomagnetic indices for the two event lists in the statistical sense. Using the ELectron SPECtrum (ELSPEC) method (based on the inversion of the electron density profile) on the radar data, we retrieve precipitating electron fluxes within 1–100 keV around each onset time, and we apply the superposed epoch analysis method to the electron spectra at each location. We compare the statistical precipitation characteristics above both sites in terms of the peak differential flux, the energy of the peak, the integrated energy flux, and their time evolution during the minutes following the onset. We find that the integrated energy flux associated with events occurring in the central part of the auroral oval (Tromsø) exhibit a sharp peak of up to 25 mW m−2 in the first 2 min following the auroral breakup before decreasing and maintaining stable values of around 7 mW m−2 for at least 20 min. In turn, no initial peak is seen near the open–closed field line boundary (Svalbard), and values remain low throughout (1–2 mW m−2). A comparison of the median spectra indicates that the precipitating flux of > 10 keV electrons is lower above Svalbard than above Tromsø by a factor of at least 10, which may partly explain the differences. However, it proves difficult to conclude whether the differences originate from the latitude at which the auroral breakup takes place or from the fact that the breakups seen from Svalbard occur Equatorward from the radar beam, which only sees expansion-phase precipitation after a few minutes.

Annales GeophysicaeVol. 42(2)
University of Helsinki (FI), University of Oulu (FI)
UK Research and Innovation, Academy of Finland, National Institute of Polar Research
Affordable and clean energy
Openalex Percentile: Top 23%
Ionosphere and magnetosphere dynamics
0.99
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.