Comparison of MLR, MNLR, and ANN Models for Estimation of Young’s Modulus (E50) and Poisson’s Ratio (υ) of Rock Materials Using Non-Destructive Measurement Methods

In this study, the static E50 and υ parameters of rock materials were investigated using P-S wave velocities and Shore hardness (SH), using non-destructive measurement methods. In this study, the multiple linear regression (MLR), multiple non-linear regression (MNLR), and artificial neural network (ANN) models were used to estimate and determine the static E50 and υ parameters. When comparing the models defined by MLR, MNLR, and ANN to the R2 values, it was found that the ANN models, which estimate the E50 and υ parameters of rock materials using non-destructive methods (Vp, Vs, Vp/Vs, ρd, and SH), achieved higher accuracy than the MLR and MNLR models. The originality of this study is rooted in the fact that ores such as galena, chromite, and barite were studied for the first time from a rock mechanics perspective, providing an innovative viewpoint. In addition, the use of all non-destructive measurement methods, Vp, Vs, and Shore hardness tests, also increases the importance of the study findings.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Mining
Published
2024-09-06
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/mining4030036
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Rock Mechanics and Modeling
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.27
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparison of MLR, MNLR, and ANN Models for Estimation of Young’s Modulus (E50) and Poisson’s Ratio (υ) of Rock Materials Using Non-Destructive Measurement Methods

Orçun Tugay Deniz, Vedat Denız
1 citations
Mining
Rock Mechanics and Modeling
0.27
article

Comparison of MLR, MNLR, and ANN Models for Estimation of Young’s Modulus (E50) and Poisson’s Ratio (υ) of Rock Materials Using Non-Destructive Measurement Methods

Orçun Tugay Deniz, Vedat Denız
article en
1 citations

Abstract

In this study, the static E50 and υ parameters of rock materials were investigated using P-S wave velocities and Shore hardness (SH), using non-destructive measurement methods. In this study, the multiple linear regression (MLR), multiple non-linear regression (MNLR), and artificial neural network (ANN) models were used to estimate and determine the static E50 and υ parameters. When comparing the models defined by MLR, MNLR, and ANN to the R2 values, it was found that the ANN models, which estimate the E50 and υ parameters of rock materials using non-destructive methods (Vp, Vs, Vp/Vs, ρd, and SH), achieved higher accuracy than the MLR and MNLR models. The originality of this study is rooted in the fact that ores such as galena, chromite, and barite were studied for the first time from a rock mechanics perspective, providing an innovative viewpoint. In addition, the use of all non-destructive measurement methods, Vp, Vs, and Shore hardness tests, also increases the importance of the study findings.

MiningVol. 4(3)
Montanuniversität Leoben (AT), Hitit Üniversitesi (TR)
Life below water
Openalex Percentile: Top 51%
Rock Mechanics and Modeling
0.27
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.