Biological methane potentials of food waste of different components: Methane yields, production kinetics, and element balance

This study assessed the methane production from food waste (FW) with dominant components of Meat (MFW), Fruit &Veg (VFW), Grain (GFW), Dairy (DFW), and the mixed feed of these components (MixFW). The high protein and lipid content FW (HPLFW) of MFW, DFW, and MixFW showed the methane yields of 337.0 ± 3.0, 307.4 ± 0.8, and 297.1 ± 1.2 ml-CH<sub>4</sub>/gCOD, respectively, while those for the high carbohydrate content FW (HCFW) of VFW and GFW were 238.3 ± 1.2 and 171.2 ± 0.3 ml-CH<sub>4</sub>/gCOD, respectively. A modified two-component kinetic (MTK) model was demonstrated to be the best to describe the methane production kinetics of both HPLFW and HCFW types of feeds. The element balance analysis revealed the element formula of the FW feeds and the methane-conversion organic content. The results obtained from this study showed that the high lipid and animal protein content increased the methane yield and biogas methane composition.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Bioresource Technology
Published
2024-09-06
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2024.131435
Citations
13
Primary Topic
Agriculture Sustainability and Environmental Impact
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
5.97

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Biological methane potentials of food waste of different components: Methane yields, production kinetics, and element balance

Sheng Chang, Justin A Donatelli
13 citations
Bioresource Technology
Agriculture Sustainability and Environmental Impact
5.97
article

Biological methane potentials of food waste of different components: Methane yields, production kinetics, and element balance

Sheng Chang, Justin A Donatelli
article en
13 citations

Abstract

This study assessed the methane production from food waste (FW) with dominant components of Meat (MFW), Fruit &Veg (VFW), Grain (GFW), Dairy (DFW), and the mixed feed of these components (MixFW). The high protein and lipid content FW (HPLFW) of MFW, DFW, and MixFW showed the methane yields of 337.0 ± 3.0, 307.4 ± 0.8, and 297.1 ± 1.2 ml-CH<sub>4</sub>/gCOD, respectively, while those for the high carbohydrate content FW (HCFW) of VFW and GFW were 238.3 ± 1.2 and 171.2 ± 0.3 ml-CH<sub>4</sub>/gCOD, respectively. A modified two-component kinetic (MTK) model was demonstrated to be the best to describe the methane production kinetics of both HPLFW and HCFW types of feeds. The element balance analysis revealed the element formula of the FW feeds and the methane-conversion organic content. The results obtained from this study showed that the high lipid and animal protein content increased the methane yield and biogas methane composition.

Bioresource TechnologyVol. 413
University of Guelph (CA)
Ontario Ministry of Economic Development, Job Creation and Trade
Zero hunger
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Agriculture Sustainability and Environmental Impact
5.97
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Biological methane potentials of food waste of different components: Methane yields, production kinetics, and element balance — Sheng Chang, Justin A Donatelli · Bioresource Technology (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS