On current problems of the mechanism of liability of judges for disciplinary misconduct: Law enforcement practice, general approachesPart 3. On disciplinary liability of retired judges

In the present article, the third in the series devoted to a perspective of disciplinary responsibility of judges features of the mechanism of disciplinary responsibility of the judges staying in resignation are considered. Two groups of the judges staying in resignation are considered: a) “vacationers” as pensioners or working in the positions permitted by the law; b) called according to the legislation for direct implementation of justice for a certain term. The author pays attention that disciplinary this type of responsibility of judges-retirees is conditional, in the law it is not called in any way, for violation set the bans and restrictions for the judges staying in resignation the only type of responsibility – the resignation termination is established that does not give the chance for perfect offense to apply adequate punishment. The author formulates the conclusions, proposals are made.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Gosudarstvo i pravo
Published
2024-09-06
DOI
https://doi.org/10.31857/s1026945224060043
Primary Topic
Education, Law, and Society
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

On current problems of the mechanism of liability of judges for disciplinary misconduct: Law enforcement practice, general approachesPart 3. On disciplinary liability of retired judges

Mikhail I. Kleandrov
Gosudarstvo i pravo
Education, Law, and Society
article

On current problems of the mechanism of liability of judges for disciplinary misconduct: Law enforcement practice, general approachesPart 3. On disciplinary liability of retired judges

Mikhail I. Kleandrov
article en

Abstract

In the present article, the third in the series devoted to a perspective of disciplinary responsibility of judges features of the mechanism of disciplinary responsibility of the judges staying in resignation are considered. Two groups of the judges staying in resignation are considered: a) “vacationers” as pensioners or working in the positions permitted by the law; b) called according to the legislation for direct implementation of justice for a certain term. The author pays attention that disciplinary this type of responsibility of judges-retirees is conditional, in the law it is not called in any way, for violation set the bans and restrictions for the judges staying in resignation the only type of responsibility – the resignation termination is established that does not give the chance for perfect offense to apply adequate punishment. The author formulates the conclusions, proposals are made.

Gosudarstvo i pravo(6)
Institute of State and Law of the Slovak Academy of Sciences (SK)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 77%
Education, Law, and Society
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

On current problems of the mechanism of liability of judges for disciplinary misconduct: Law enforcement practice, general approachesPart 3. On disciplinary liability of retired judges — Mikhail I. Kleandrov · Gosudarstvo i pravo (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS