Laboratory-scale insight into ultrasonic and acoustic emission indicators for damage characterization and hazard assessment of deep shale

The loaded rock experiences multiple stages of deformation. It starts with the formation of microcracks at low stresses (crack initiation, CI) and then transitions into unstable crack propagation (crack damage, CD) near the ultimate strength. In this study, both the acoustic emission method (AEM) and the ultrasonic testing method (UTM) were used to examine the characteristics of AE parameters ( b -value, peak frequency, frequency-band energy ratio, and fractal dimension) and ultrasonic (ULT) properties (velocity, amplitude, energy attenuation, and scattering attenuation) of bedded shale at CI, CD, and ultimate strength. The comparison involved analyzing the strain-based method (SBM), AEM, and UTM to determine the thresholds for damage stress. A fuzzy comprehensive evaluation model (FCEM) was created to describe the damage thresholds and hazard assessment. The results indicate that the optimal AE and ULT parameters for identifying CI and CD stress are ringing count, ultrasonic amplitude, energy attenuation, and scattering attenuation of the S-wave. Besides, damage thresholds were detected earlier by AE monitoring, ranging from 3 MPa to 10 MPa. CI and CD identified by UTM occurred later than SBM and AEM, and were in the range of 12 MPa. The b -value, peak frequency, energy ratio in the low-frequency band (0–62.5 kHz), correlation dimension, and sandbox dimension showed low values at the peak stress, while the energy ratio in a moderate-frequency band (187.5–281.25 kHz) and amplitude showed high values. The successful application of FCEM to laboratory testing of shales has demonstrated its ability to quantitatively identify AE/ULT precursors of seismic hazards associated with rock failure.