Diagnostic classification based on DNA methylation profiles using sequential machine learning approaches

Aberrant methylation patterns in human DNA have great potential for the discovery of novel diagnostic and disease progression biomarkers. In this paper we used machine learning algorithms to identify promising methylation sites for diagnosing cancerous tissue and to classify patients based on methylation values at these sites. We used genome-wide DNA methylation patterns from both cancerous and normal tissue samples, obtained from the Genomic Data Commons consortium and trialled our methods on three types of urological cancer. A decision tree was used to identify the methylation sites most useful for diagnosis. The identified locations were then used to train a neural network to classify samples as either cancerous or non-cancerous. Using this two-step approach we found strong indicative biomarker panels for each of the three cancer types. These methods could likely be translated to other cancers and improved by using non-invasive liquid methods such as blood instead of biopsy tissue.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
PLoS ONE
Published
2024-09-06
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0307912
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Epigenetics and DNA Methylation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.47
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Diagnostic classification based on DNA methylation profiles using sequential machine learning approaches

Jan P. Lavender, Marcin W. Wojewodzic
2 citations
PLoS ONE
Epigenetics and DNA Methylation
0.47
article

Diagnostic classification based on DNA methylation profiles using sequential machine learning approaches

Jan P. Lavender, Marcin W. Wojewodzic
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Aberrant methylation patterns in human DNA have great potential for the discovery of novel diagnostic and disease progression biomarkers. In this paper we used machine learning algorithms to identify promising methylation sites for diagnosing cancerous tissue and to classify patients based on methylation values at these sites. We used genome-wide DNA methylation patterns from both cancerous and normal tissue samples, obtained from the Genomic Data Commons consortium and trialled our methods on three types of urological cancer. A decision tree was used to identify the methylation sites most useful for diagnosis. The identified locations were then used to train a neural network to classify samples as either cancerous or non-cancerous. Using this two-step approach we found strong indicative biomarker panels for each of the three cancer types. These methods could likely be translated to other cancers and improved by using non-invasive liquid methods such as blood instead of biopsy tissue.

PLoS ONEVol. 19(9)
Norwegian Institute of Public Health (NO), Cancer Registry of Norway (NO), University of Birmingham (GB)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 35%
Epigenetics and DNA Methylation
0.47
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.