Assessment of the efficacy of field and laboratory methods for the detection of Tropilaelaps spp.

Tropilaelaps spp. are invasive mites that cause severe disease in Apis mellifera colonies. The UK has deployed an elaborate surveillance system that seeks to detect these mites early in any invasion to allow the best opportunity to eradicate any incursion. Effective field and laboratory protocols, capable of reliably detecting low numbers of mites, are key to the success of any intervention. Here we compared the efficacy of established field monitoring using brood removal with an uncapping fork, and brood 'bump' methods with novel methods for Tropilaelaps detection modified from Varroa monitoring schemes. In addition, we monitored the efficacy of the laboratory method for screening for mites in hive debris by floating mites in ethanol. Our results clearly indicated that novel methods such as uncapping infested brood with tweezers, catching mite drop using sticky traps and rolling adult bees in icing sugar were all significantly more likely to detect Tropilaelaps than existing methods such as using an uncapping fork on infested brood, or the brood 'bump' method. Existing laboratory protocols that sieved hive debris and then floated the mite containing layer failed to detect Tropilaelaps mites and new efficacious protocols were developed. Our results demonstrated that the national surveillance protocols for Tropilaelaps mite detection required modification to improve the early detection of this damaging invasive mite.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
PLoS ONE
Published
2024-09-06
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0301880
Citations
9
Primary Topic
Insect and Pesticide Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
4.86

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Assessment of the efficacy of field and laboratory methods for the detection of Tropilaelaps spp.

Maggie C. Gill, Paul Davies, Victoria Tomkies, Giles E. Budge et al.
9 citations
PLoS ONE
Insect and Pesticide Research
4.86
article

Assessment of the efficacy of field and laboratory methods for the detection of Tropilaelaps spp.

Maggie C. Gill, Paul Davies, Victoria Tomkies, Giles E. Budge, Lakkhika Panyaraksa, Bajaree Chuttong, Dan Etheridge, George Tonge
article en
9 citations

Abstract

Tropilaelaps spp. are invasive mites that cause severe disease in Apis mellifera colonies. The UK has deployed an elaborate surveillance system that seeks to detect these mites early in any invasion to allow the best opportunity to eradicate any incursion. Effective field and laboratory protocols, capable of reliably detecting low numbers of mites, are key to the success of any intervention. Here we compared the efficacy of established field monitoring using brood removal with an uncapping fork, and brood 'bump' methods with novel methods for Tropilaelaps detection modified from Varroa monitoring schemes. In addition, we monitored the efficacy of the laboratory method for screening for mites in hive debris by floating mites in ethanol. Our results clearly indicated that novel methods such as uncapping infested brood with tweezers, catching mite drop using sticky traps and rolling adult bees in icing sugar were all significantly more likely to detect Tropilaelaps than existing methods such as using an uncapping fork on infested brood, or the brood 'bump' method. Existing laboratory protocols that sieved hive debris and then floated the mite containing layer failed to detect Tropilaelaps mites and new efficacious protocols were developed. Our results demonstrated that the national surveillance protocols for Tropilaelaps mite detection required modification to improve the early detection of this damaging invasive mite.

PLoS ONEVol. 19(9)
Fera Science (United Kingdom) (GB), Department for Environment Food and Rural Affairs (GB), Animal and Plant Health Agency (GB), Horizon House (US), Chiang Mai University (TH), Newcastle University (GB)
Government of the United Kingdom, UK Research and Innovation, HORIZON EUROPE Framework Programme
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Insect and Pesticide Research
4.86
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.