“But some were more equal than others:” Exploring inequality at Neolithic Çatalhöyük

We explore the ways in which residents of Neolithic Çatalhöyük in Anatolia differentiated themselves as well as the ways in which they did not. We integrate numerous data sets in order to assess patterns of inequality (A) across buildings with contemporaneous occupations, (B) between buildings that did or did not burn at abandonment, and (C) through time. We use Gini coefficients so as to maximize comparability with other studies of inequality in the ancient and modern worlds, discussing the underlying data and our results to clarify and enhance the value of the quantitative analyses. We evaluate whether or not trajectories of inequality align across data sets in order to determine how far success in one realm correlated with success in another. Our results indicate no unified trajectory of inequality through time. We perceive broadly similar access to staple foods, but not to goods less directly related to survival; relatively elevated income inequality during the middle portion of the site's occupation, plausibly deliberately tamped down; and no evidence for institutionalized or lasting economic or social inequality. These findings shed light on Neolithic social dynamics and also contribute to broader discussions of inequality and the social ramifications of early agropastoralism.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
PLoS ONE
Published
2024-09-06
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0307067
Citations
5
Primary Topic
Archaeology and ancient environmental studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
7.94
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

“But some were more equal than others:” Exploring inequality at Neolithic Çatalhöyük

Amy Bogaard, Gesualdo Busacca, Katheryn C. Twiss, Jessica Pearson et al.
5 citations
PLoS ONE
Archaeology and ancient environmental studies
7.94
article

“But some were more equal than others:” Exploring inequality at Neolithic Çatalhöyük

Amy Bogaard, Gesualdo Busacca, Katheryn C. Twiss, Jessica Pearson, Christopher J. Knüsel, Milena Vasić, Christina Tsoraki, Kevin Kay, James Stuart Taylor, Scott D. Haddow, Marco Milella, Camilla Mazzucato, Rena Veropoulidou, Sharon Pochron
article en
5 citations

Abstract

We explore the ways in which residents of Neolithic Çatalhöyük in Anatolia differentiated themselves as well as the ways in which they did not. We integrate numerous data sets in order to assess patterns of inequality (A) across buildings with contemporaneous occupations, (B) between buildings that did or did not burn at abandonment, and (C) through time. We use Gini coefficients so as to maximize comparability with other studies of inequality in the ancient and modern worlds, discussing the underlying data and our results to clarify and enhance the value of the quantitative analyses. We evaluate whether or not trajectories of inequality align across data sets in order to determine how far success in one realm correlated with success in another. Our results indicate no unified trajectory of inequality through time. We perceive broadly similar access to staple foods, but not to goods less directly related to survival; relatively elevated income inequality during the middle portion of the site's occupation, plausibly deliberately tamped down; and no evidence for institutionalized or lasting economic or social inequality. These findings shed light on Neolithic social dynamics and also contribute to broader discussions of inequality and the social ramifications of early agropastoralism.

PLoS ONEVol. 19(9)
University of Bern (CH), University of Copenhagen (DK), Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (FR), University of Liverpool (GB), Université de Bordeaux (FR), University of Leicester (GB), Hellenic Ministry of Culture and Sports (GR), University of Oxford (GB), De la Préhistoire à l'Actuel : Culture, Environnement et Anthropologie (FR), Oxford Archaeology (GB), University of York (GB), Stony Brook University (US), Syracuse University (US)
No poverty
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
Archaeology and ancient environmental studies
7.94
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.