Ex-post assessment of merger remedies: the CMA’S 2023 merger remedy evaluations

Evaluating the impact and implementation of interventions is an important aspect of public policy. Evaluations help policymakers understand what worked well and what has been less successful. They provide the basis for continuous improvement and can drive legislative reform and policy development, as well as informing future interventions. This article considers the findings of the CMA’s most recent update in its merger remedy evaluation programme, which focussed on the learnings from a set of merger case studies where the CMA required ‘carve-out’ divestiture remedies to be implemented. This recent research highlights the generally higher risk profile of carve-out remedies compared to the divestiture of stand-alone business units, which decision makers will need to take into account before concluding whether such a remedy will be effective.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Competition Law Journal
Published
2024-09-06
DOI
https://doi.org/10.4337/clj.2024.01.06
Primary Topic
International Arbitration and Investment Law
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Ex-post assessment of merger remedies: the CMA’S 2023 merger remedy evaluations

Colin Garland, Steve Pantling, Kapileshen Kiritharan
Competition Law Journal
International Arbitration and Investment Law
article

Ex-post assessment of merger remedies: the CMA’S 2023 merger remedy evaluations

Colin Garland, Steve Pantling, Kapileshen Kiritharan
article en

Abstract

Evaluating the impact and implementation of interventions is an important aspect of public policy. Evaluations help policymakers understand what worked well and what has been less successful. They provide the basis for continuous improvement and can drive legislative reform and policy development, as well as informing future interventions. This article considers the findings of the CMA’s most recent update in its merger remedy evaluation programme, which focussed on the learnings from a set of merger case studies where the CMA required ‘carve-out’ divestiture remedies to be implemented. This recent research highlights the generally higher risk profile of carve-out remedies compared to the divestiture of stand-alone business units, which decision makers will need to take into account before concluding whether such a remedy will be effective.

Competition Law JournalVol. 23(1)
Financial Services Authority (GB)
Openalex Percentile: Top 74%
International Arbitration and Investment Law
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.