Learning-Based Bayesian Inference for Testing of Autonomous Systems

For the safe operation of robotic systems, it is important to accurately understand its failure modes using prior testing. Hardware testing of robotic infrastructure is known to be slow and costly. Instead, failure prediction in simulation can help to analyze the system before deployment. Conventionally, large-scale naïve Monte Carlo simulations are used for testing; however, this method is only suitable for testing average system performance. For safety-critical systems, worst-case performance is more crucial as failures are often rare events, and the size of test batches increases substantially as failures become rarer. Rare-event sampling methods can be helpful; however, they exhibit slow convergence and cannot handle constraints. This research introduces a novel sampling-based testing framework for autonomous systems which bridges these gaps by utilizing a discretized gradient-based second-order Langevin algorithm combined with learning-based techniques for constrained sampling of failure modes. Our method can predict more diverse failures by exploring the search space efficiently and ensures feasibility with respect to temporal and implicit constraints. We demonstrate the use of our testing methodology on two categories of testing problems, via simulations and hardware experiments. Our method discovers up to 2X failures compared to naïve Random Walk sampling, with only half of the sample size.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters
Published
2024-09-06
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1109/lra.2024.3455782
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Gaussian Processes and Bayesian Inference
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.35

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Learning-Based Bayesian Inference for Testing of Autonomous Systems

Charles Dawson, Chuchu Fan, Anjali Parashar, Panagiotis Tsiotras et al.
1 citations
IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters
Gaussian Processes and Bayesian Inference
0.35
article

Learning-Based Bayesian Inference for Testing of Autonomous Systems

Charles Dawson, Chuchu Fan, Anjali Parashar, Panagiotis Tsiotras, Ji Yin
article en
1 citations

Abstract

For the safe operation of robotic systems, it is important to accurately understand its failure modes using prior testing. Hardware testing of robotic infrastructure is known to be slow and costly. Instead, failure prediction in simulation can help to analyze the system before deployment. Conventionally, large-scale naïve Monte Carlo simulations are used for testing; however, this method is only suitable for testing average system performance. For safety-critical systems, worst-case performance is more crucial as failures are often rare events, and the size of test batches increases substantially as failures become rarer. Rare-event sampling methods can be helpful; however, they exhibit slow convergence and cannot handle constraints. This research introduces a novel sampling-based testing framework for autonomous systems which bridges these gaps by utilizing a discretized gradient-based second-order Langevin algorithm combined with learning-based techniques for constrained sampling of failure modes. Our method can predict more diverse failures by exploring the search space efficiently and ensures feasibility with respect to temporal and implicit constraints. We demonstrate the use of our testing methodology on two categories of testing problems, via simulations and hardware experiments. Our method discovers up to 2X failures compared to naïve Random Walk sampling, with only half of the sample size.

IEEE Robotics and Automation LettersVol. 9(10)
Georgia Institute of Technology (US), Decision Systems (United States) (US), Massachusetts Institute of Technology (US)
National Aeronautics and Space Administration, Air Force Office of Scientific Research
Openalex Percentile: Top 34%
Gaussian Processes and Bayesian Inference
0.35
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.