Which Concepts Are Key to Transitioning From Nonhuman Animal Models to Engineered Microphysiological Systems in Biomedical Research?

A transition from nonhuman animal models to engineered microphysiological systems (MPS), such as organoids and organ-on-a-chip technologies, would signal a paradigm shift in biomedical research. Despite MPS' potential to more accurately model human physiology, reduce high failure rates of drugs in clinical trials, and limit unnecessary animal use, widespread adoption is hampered by public opinion and lack of scalability, standardization, and current regulatory uptake. This article suggests how 5 key concepts (awareness, access, education, application, and rewards) could help address these barriers. These concepts are part of a framework that underscores a need to integrate MPS into mainstream biomedical research and to better promote ethical responsibility for the means of biomedical innovation.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
The AMA Journal of Ethic
Published
2024-09-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1001/amajethics.2024.709
Citations
2
Primary Topic
3D Printing in Biomedical Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.37

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Which Concepts Are Key to Transitioning From Nonhuman Animal Models to Engineered Microphysiological Systems in Biomedical Research?

Erin Sharoni
2 citations
The AMA Journal of Ethic
3D Printing in Biomedical Research
0.37
article

Which Concepts Are Key to Transitioning From Nonhuman Animal Models to Engineered Microphysiological Systems in Biomedical Research?

Erin Sharoni
article en
2 citations

Abstract

A transition from nonhuman animal models to engineered microphysiological systems (MPS), such as organoids and organ-on-a-chip technologies, would signal a paradigm shift in biomedical research. Despite MPS' potential to more accurately model human physiology, reduce high failure rates of drugs in clinical trials, and limit unnecessary animal use, widespread adoption is hampered by public opinion and lack of scalability, standardization, and current regulatory uptake. This article suggests how 5 key concepts (awareness, access, education, application, and rewards) could help address these barriers. These concepts are part of a framework that underscores a need to integrate MPS into mainstream biomedical research and to better promote ethical responsibility for the means of biomedical innovation.

The AMA Journal of EthicVol. 26(9)
Institute of Medical Ethics (GB)
Hansjörg Wyss Institute for Biologically Inspired Engineering, Harvard University
Zero hunger
Openalex Percentile: Top 44%
3D Printing in Biomedical Research
0.37
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Which Concepts Are Key to Transitioning From Nonhuman Animal Models to Engineered Microphysiological Systems in Biomedical Research? — Erin Sharoni · The AMA Journal of Ethic (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS