How Should the 3 <i>R</i>’s Be Revised and Why?
The Principles of Humane Experimental Technique established what many know today as the "3 R's"-refinement, reduction, and replacement-when it was published in 1959. Since their formulation, these principles have guided decision-making for many about nonhuman animal subjects' uses in laboratory-based research. Discussion about how to amend or replace the 3 R's is ongoing, driven mainly by philosophical ethics approaches to nonhuman animal rights and by scientific advancement. This article explores merits and drawbacks of possible updates to and interpretations of the 3 R's.
Authors
- Paul Locke
- Rebecca Critser
Institutions
- Johns Hopkins University (US)
Publication Details
- Journal
- The AMA Journal of Ethic
- Published
- 2024-09-01
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.1001/amajethics.2024.724
- Citations
- 3
- Primary Topic
- Animal testing and alternatives
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 1.91