Adoptability assessment of HCDI and RCCI modes in plug-in parallel hybrid electric vehicles using sustainable fuels and model-based torque structure calibration strategies

In this research, a comparative analysis of plug-in hybrid electric vehicle (PHEV) engine was conducted with two advanced low temperature combustion (LTC) techniques viz. Homogeneous charge with direct injection (HCDI) and reactivity-controlled compression ignition (RCCI), utilizing alternative fuels diethyl ether (DEE) and ethanol. This was attempted to exhibit the promising potential of LTC based PHEV to achieve the highest efficiency and low emissions. The experimental results disclosed that DEE powered HCDI can achieve superior thermal efficiency with an impressive peak torque of 14 Nm. On the other hand, ethanol powered RCCI produced a peak torque of 17.5 Nm with remarkable emission reduction characteristics, especially CO 2 . It was vindicated that HCDI-PHEV outperformed the RCCI-PHEV in terms of fuel economy despite both HCDI and RCCI being lower than the conventional diesel PHEV. The NO x emissions from HCDI were almost negligible. About 20 % lower nitrogen oxide (NO x ) emissions were recorded for RCCI respectively as compared to diesel (36 g/s). HCDI and RCCI showcased about 2 and 1.3 times higher soot emissions than diesel (7.12 g/s). Fuel economy was improved by 15 % and 43 % respectively under HCDI and RCCI modes over the conventional diesel mode of PHEV operation. When the PHEV was operated continuously for about 3.5 h, the battery's SOC dropped from 80 % to 45 % under diesel operation, whereas it only reached 50 % and 60 % under RCCI and HCDI mode operation. Low fuel consumption characteristics, acceptable torque production capabilities and ultralow NO x reduction potential established HCDI as the preferable choice for PHEV over RCCI. • Point-by-point method is employed for HCDI and RCCI control map development. • Peak torque was 17.5 Nm delivered by Ethanol-RCCI and 14 Nm by DEE-HCDI. • PHEV of diesel outperformed HCDI by 15 % and RCCI by 43 % in terms of fuel efficiency. • Ultra-low NOx emission is achieved in the HCDI-PHEV. • DEE-HCDI is the most preferable choice of PHEV than the ethanol-RCCI.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Results in Engineering
Published
2024-09-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rineng.2024.102859
Citations
6
Primary Topic
Advanced Combustion Engine Technologies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.31
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Adoptability assessment of HCDI and RCCI modes in plug-in parallel hybrid electric vehicles using sustainable fuels and model-based torque structure calibration strategies

B. Ashok, Dariusz Szpica, M. Senthil Kumar, R. Vignesh et al.
6 citations
Results in Engineering
Advanced Combustion Engine Technologies
1.31
article

Adoptability assessment of HCDI and RCCI modes in plug-in parallel hybrid electric vehicles using sustainable fuels and model-based torque structure calibration strategies

B. Ashok, Dariusz Szpica, M. Senthil Kumar, R. Vignesh, Mahidhar Tanay, G. Samay
article en
6 citations

Abstract

In this research, a comparative analysis of plug-in hybrid electric vehicle (PHEV) engine was conducted with two advanced low temperature combustion (LTC) techniques viz. Homogeneous charge with direct injection (HCDI) and reactivity-controlled compression ignition (RCCI), utilizing alternative fuels diethyl ether (DEE) and ethanol. This was attempted to exhibit the promising potential of LTC based PHEV to achieve the highest efficiency and low emissions. The experimental results disclosed that DEE powered HCDI can achieve superior thermal efficiency with an impressive peak torque of 14 Nm. On the other hand, ethanol powered RCCI produced a peak torque of 17.5 Nm with remarkable emission reduction characteristics, especially CO 2 . It was vindicated that HCDI-PHEV outperformed the RCCI-PHEV in terms of fuel economy despite both HCDI and RCCI being lower than the conventional diesel PHEV. The NO x emissions from HCDI were almost negligible. About 20 % lower nitrogen oxide (NO x ) emissions were recorded for RCCI respectively as compared to diesel (36 g/s). HCDI and RCCI showcased about 2 and 1.3 times higher soot emissions than diesel (7.12 g/s). Fuel economy was improved by 15 % and 43 % respectively under HCDI and RCCI modes over the conventional diesel mode of PHEV operation. When the PHEV was operated continuously for about 3.5 h, the battery's SOC dropped from 80 % to 45 % under diesel operation, whereas it only reached 50 % and 60 % under RCCI and HCDI mode operation. Low fuel consumption characteristics, acceptable torque production capabilities and ultralow NO x reduction potential established HCDI as the preferable choice for PHEV over RCCI. • Point-by-point method is employed for HCDI and RCCI control map development. • Peak torque was 17.5 Nm delivered by Ethanol-RCCI and 14 Nm by DEE-HCDI. • PHEV of diesel outperformed HCDI by 15 % and RCCI by 43 % in terms of fuel efficiency. • Ultra-low NOx emission is achieved in the HCDI-PHEV. • DEE-HCDI is the most preferable choice of PHEV than the ethanol-RCCI.

Results in EngineeringVol. 23
Bialystok University of Technology (PL), Vellore Institute of Technology University (IN)
Responsible consumption and production
Openalex Percentile: Top 23%
Advanced Combustion Engine Technologies
1.31
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.