Integrating petrophysical data into efficient iterative cluster analysis for electrofacies identification in clastic reservoirs

Efficient iterative unsupervised machine learning involving probabilistic clustering analysis with the expectation-maximization (EM) clustering algorithm is applied to categorize reservoir facies by exploiting latent and observable well-log variables from a clastic reservoir in the Majnoon oilfield, southern Iraq. The observable well-log variables consist of conventional open-hole, well-log data and the computer-processed interpretation of gamma rays, bulk density, neutron porosity, compressional sonic, deep resistivity, shale volume, total porosity, and water saturation, from three wells located in the Nahr Umr reservoir. The latent variables include shale volume and water saturation. The EM algorithm efficiently characterizes electrofacies through iterative machine learning to identify the local maximum likelihood estimates (MLE) of the observable and latent variables in the studied dataset. The optimized EM model developed successfully predicts the core-derived facies classification in two of the studied wells. The EM model clusters the data into three distinctive reservoir electrofacies (F1, F2, and F3). F1 represents a gas-bearing electrofacies with low shale volume ( V sh ) and water saturation ( S w ) and high porosity and permeability values identifying it as an attractive reservoir target. The results of the EM model are validated using nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) data from the third studied well for which no cores were recovered. The NMR results confirm the effectiveness and accuracy of the EM model in predicting electrofacies. The utilization of the EM algorithm for electrofacies classification/cluster analysis is innovative. Specifically, the clusters it establishes are less rigidly constrained than those derived from the more commonly used K-means clustering method. The EM methodology developed generates dependable electrofacies estimates in the studied reservoir intervals where core samples are not available. Therefore, once calibrated with core data in some wells, the model is suitable for application to other wells that lack core data. • ML- Cluster analysis was used for electrofacies identification based on well-logs. • The data include latent and observable well logs from the Nahr Umr clastic reservoir. • The EM algorithm predicted three optimal electrofacies from the Nahr Umr reservoir. • The NMR log was used for further validation. • The study was applied on the Nahr Umr clastic reservoir data.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Energy Geoscience
Published
2024-09-06
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engeos.2024.100341
Citations
7
Primary Topic
Hydrocarbon exploration and reservoir analysis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.88
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Integrating petrophysical data into efficient iterative cluster analysis for electrofacies identification in clastic reservoirs

Watheq J. Al‐Mudhafar, Aqsa Anees, David A. Wood, Mohammed A. Abbas
7 citations
Energy Geoscience
Hydrocarbon exploration and reservoir analysis
1.88
article

Integrating petrophysical data into efficient iterative cluster analysis for electrofacies identification in clastic reservoirs

Watheq J. Al‐Mudhafar, Aqsa Anees, David A. Wood, Mohammed A. Abbas
article en
7 citations

Abstract

Efficient iterative unsupervised machine learning involving probabilistic clustering analysis with the expectation-maximization (EM) clustering algorithm is applied to categorize reservoir facies by exploiting latent and observable well-log variables from a clastic reservoir in the Majnoon oilfield, southern Iraq. The observable well-log variables consist of conventional open-hole, well-log data and the computer-processed interpretation of gamma rays, bulk density, neutron porosity, compressional sonic, deep resistivity, shale volume, total porosity, and water saturation, from three wells located in the Nahr Umr reservoir. The latent variables include shale volume and water saturation. The EM algorithm efficiently characterizes electrofacies through iterative machine learning to identify the local maximum likelihood estimates (MLE) of the observable and latent variables in the studied dataset. The optimized EM model developed successfully predicts the core-derived facies classification in two of the studied wells. The EM model clusters the data into three distinctive reservoir electrofacies (F1, F2, and F3). F1 represents a gas-bearing electrofacies with low shale volume ( V sh ) and water saturation ( S w ) and high porosity and permeability values identifying it as an attractive reservoir target. The results of the EM model are validated using nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) data from the third studied well for which no cores were recovered. The NMR results confirm the effectiveness and accuracy of the EM model in predicting electrofacies. The utilization of the EM algorithm for electrofacies classification/cluster analysis is innovative. Specifically, the clusters it establishes are less rigidly constrained than those derived from the more commonly used K-means clustering method. The EM methodology developed generates dependable electrofacies estimates in the studied reservoir intervals where core samples are not available. Therefore, once calibrated with core data in some wells, the model is suitable for application to other wells that lack core data. • ML- Cluster analysis was used for electrofacies identification based on well-logs. • The data include latent and observable well logs from the Nahr Umr clastic reservoir. • The EM algorithm predicted three optimal electrofacies from the Nahr Umr reservoir. • The NMR log was used for further validation. • The study was applied on the Nahr Umr clastic reservoir data.

Energy GeoscienceVol. 5(4)
University of Basrah (IQ), EDF Energy (United Kingdom) (GB), Yunnan University (CN), Yunnan Institute of Environmental Sciences (CN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 16%
Hydrocarbon exploration and reservoir analysis
1.88
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.