No evidence of increased forest loss from a mining rush in Madagascar’s eastern rainforests

Abstract Artisanal and small-scale mining is an important livelihood activity in many biodiversity hotspots. There is substantial international concern about the negative impact of artisanal and small-scale mining on biodiversity, yet in most places this remains poorly understood. We explore the impacts of a high-profile mining rush: the 2016 sapphire rush at Bemainty, Eastern Madagascar, where tens of thousands of miners descended on a protected forest. Media coverage claimed the rush caused hundreds of hectares of deforestation and threatened lemur populations. Using the synthetic control method to estimate counterfactual outcomes, we find no evidence that mining increased forest loss or degradation. Supported by informal interviews and a lemur survey, we argue that mining at Bemainty had limited impacts on the surrounding forest, relative to other threats. Our results highlight the heterogeneity of environmental impacts from artisanal and small-scale mining and emphasize the need for more robust evaluations to inform context-specific policies.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Communications Earth & Environment
Published
2024-09-06
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1038/s43247-024-01655-6
Citations
4
Primary Topic
Conservation, Biodiversity, and Resource Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.13

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

No evidence of increased forest loss from a mining rush in Madagascar’s eastern rainforests

Rio Heriniaina, Julia P. G. Jones, Simon Willcock, Katie Devenish et al.
4 citations
Communications Earth & Environment
Conservation, Biodiversity, and Resource Management
1.13
article

No evidence of increased forest loss from a mining rush in Madagascar’s eastern rainforests

Rio Heriniaina, Julia P. G. Jones, Simon Willcock, Katie Devenish, Kathryn Goodenough, O. Sarobidy Rakotonarivo
article en
4 citations

Abstract

Abstract Artisanal and small-scale mining is an important livelihood activity in many biodiversity hotspots. There is substantial international concern about the negative impact of artisanal and small-scale mining on biodiversity, yet in most places this remains poorly understood. We explore the impacts of a high-profile mining rush: the 2016 sapphire rush at Bemainty, Eastern Madagascar, where tens of thousands of miners descended on a protected forest. Media coverage claimed the rush caused hundreds of hectares of deforestation and threatened lemur populations. Using the synthetic control method to estimate counterfactual outcomes, we find no evidence that mining increased forest loss or degradation. Supported by informal interviews and a lemur survey, we argue that mining at Bemainty had limited impacts on the surrounding forest, relative to other threats. Our results highlight the heterogeneity of environmental impacts from artisanal and small-scale mining and emphasize the need for more robust evaluations to inform context-specific policies.

Communications Earth & EnvironmentVol. 5(1)
University of Antananarivo (MG), British Geological Survey (GB), Bangor University (GB), Utrecht University (NL), Rothamsted Research (GB), University of Manchester (GB), Université d’Antsiranana (MG), École Supérieure Polytechnique d'Antsiranana (MG)
Sight Research UK, Natural Environment Research Council
Openalex Percentile: Top 23%
Conservation, Biodiversity, and Resource Management
1.13
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.