Evaluation of motor capacity and neuromotor control for tapping and sliding movements reveals differences in visuomotor control

The Fitts' task is a simple and effective method for evaluating motor capacity that can be used to reveal detailed aspects of visuomotor control when hand and eye kinematics are recorded simultaneously. With advances in technology, the classical Fitts' reciprocal tapping task was modified for use with digitizer tablets and computer screens that require sliding rather than tapping hand movements, which may rely on different visuomotor control strategies. Given the ubiquity of digital devices and touchscreens that often require execution of sliding movements, it is important to compare the underlying visuomotor control and eye-hand coordination involved in reciprocal sliding and tapping movements, which was the aim of the current study. Twelve young adults performed both tasks while their hand and eye movements were recorded. Results revealed motor capacity was significantly higher (p < 0.0001, d = 2.67) in the tapping task (19.62 ± 5.89 bits/s) compared to the sliding task (7.87 ± 2.02 bits/s). Examining hand kinematics showed the deceleration interval was significantly longer in the sliding compared to the tapping task at the lowest task difficulty (ID 2.28: 0.160 s ± 0.026 vs 0.129 s ± 0.017; p < 0.01), which was exacerbated as task difficulty increased (ID 6.97: 0.355 s ± 0.059 vs 0.226 s ± 0.020, p < 0.0001), indicating greater reliance on visual feedback during the sliding task. Examining temporal eye-hand coordination pattern showed that hand movement initiation tended to precede eye movement in both tasks. Overall, the results of this study provide a comprehensive examination of eye and hand kinematics demonstrating salient differences in visuomotor control between tapping and sliding movements. The findings also reveal a novel insight into the temporal pattern of eye-hand coordination for reciprocal tapping and sliding movements, which is in contrast to previous studies that examined discrete (rather than reciprocal) target-directed pointing movements where the eyes typically precede the hand by approximately 100 ms. In conclusion, the current study revealed substantial differences between the two tasks, one major finding being the sliding movements were performed slower compared to parabolic tapping hand movements, which may have implications for designing interactive digital devices and assessment of eye-hand coordination.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Human Movement Science
Published
2024-09-06
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.humov.2024.103279
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Tactile and Sensory Interactions
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.34

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Evaluation of motor capacity and neuromotor control for tapping and sliding movements reveals differences in visuomotor control

Ewa Niechwiej‐Szwedo, Andrew Chaston, Naomi Thomas
1 citations
Human Movement Science
Tactile and Sensory Interactions
0.34
article

Evaluation of motor capacity and neuromotor control for tapping and sliding movements reveals differences in visuomotor control

Ewa Niechwiej‐Szwedo, Andrew Chaston, Naomi Thomas
article en
1 citations

Abstract

The Fitts' task is a simple and effective method for evaluating motor capacity that can be used to reveal detailed aspects of visuomotor control when hand and eye kinematics are recorded simultaneously. With advances in technology, the classical Fitts' reciprocal tapping task was modified for use with digitizer tablets and computer screens that require sliding rather than tapping hand movements, which may rely on different visuomotor control strategies. Given the ubiquity of digital devices and touchscreens that often require execution of sliding movements, it is important to compare the underlying visuomotor control and eye-hand coordination involved in reciprocal sliding and tapping movements, which was the aim of the current study. Twelve young adults performed both tasks while their hand and eye movements were recorded. Results revealed motor capacity was significantly higher (p < 0.0001, d = 2.67) in the tapping task (19.62 ± 5.89 bits/s) compared to the sliding task (7.87 ± 2.02 bits/s). Examining hand kinematics showed the deceleration interval was significantly longer in the sliding compared to the tapping task at the lowest task difficulty (ID 2.28: 0.160 s ± 0.026 vs 0.129 s ± 0.017; p < 0.01), which was exacerbated as task difficulty increased (ID 6.97: 0.355 s ± 0.059 vs 0.226 s ± 0.020, p < 0.0001), indicating greater reliance on visual feedback during the sliding task. Examining temporal eye-hand coordination pattern showed that hand movement initiation tended to precede eye movement in both tasks. Overall, the results of this study provide a comprehensive examination of eye and hand kinematics demonstrating salient differences in visuomotor control between tapping and sliding movements. The findings also reveal a novel insight into the temporal pattern of eye-hand coordination for reciprocal tapping and sliding movements, which is in contrast to previous studies that examined discrete (rather than reciprocal) target-directed pointing movements where the eyes typically precede the hand by approximately 100 ms. In conclusion, the current study revealed substantial differences between the two tasks, one major finding being the sliding movements were performed slower compared to parabolic tapping hand movements, which may have implications for designing interactive digital devices and assessment of eye-hand coordination.

Human Movement ScienceVol. 98
University of Waterloo (CA)
Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
Affordable and clean energy
Openalex Percentile: Top 41%
Tactile and Sensory Interactions
0.34
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.