Comparing evaporation from water balance framework and multiple models on a global scale
• Unprecedented estimates of ET differences (DET) from water balance and global models. • Human activities including water use and reservoir construction contribute to DET. • Precipitation uncertainty also leads to DET deviation, especially in humid zones. Terrestrial evaporation (ET) estimates from the water balance framework and large-scale modeling have been widely used in the evaluation and prediction of hydrological regimes. However, each method has its inherent limitations, including the external bias introduced by forcing variables, simplified functional relationships, and unconsidered human modules. A systematic comparison between water balance ET and modeled ET remains unexplored. Here, we quantify and attribute the difference between water balance estimations of ET and model-simulated ET (i.e., DET) on a global scale. We apply an unprecedentedly unique probabilistic ensemble of 84,042 DET estimates (2002–2021) based on all currently available datasets on water balance components. Satisfactory performance is found from the validation of the water balance-derived ET against several benchmarking ET products. We identify the regions with significantly positive DET in South and East Asia, Southern and Northern Africa, and southwestern parts of North America, with a global mean of 7 mm/a (5 % spread range: –2 to 16 mm/a). The patterns are primarily contributed by human water use and reservoir construction. We also report negative DET in the majority of South America, which may be related to human-induced deforestation. In addition, the seasonality of DET reflects the significant role of irrigation in regional ET dynamics. Variance analysis indicates higher uncertainties of DET in humid zones, mainly contributed by precipitation and simulated ET. Our uncertainty-constrained DET estimates have potential implications for assessing global and regional water availability, benchmarking climate and hydrological models, and developing sustainable mitigation and adaptation strategies.
Authors
- Shuang Yi (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2976-2351)
- Ningpeng Dong (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5226-6180)
- J. S. Famiglietti (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6053-5379)
- Li Xu (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5580-8774)
- Pat J.‐F. Yeh (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7629-3362)
- Jinghua Xiong (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7435-9911)
- Lei Cheng (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5298-9573)
- Shenglian Guo (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8594-4988)
- Haoran Hao
- Yun Pan (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9634-7612)
- Hrishikesh A. Chandanpurkar (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7573-8056)
- Chong Zhang (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5486-7406)
- Abhishek Abhishek (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1704-4486)
- Zhongbo Yu
Institutions
- Monash University Malaysia (MY)
- Indian Institute of Technology Roorkee (IN)
- Tianjin University (CN)
- Hohai University (CN)
- Flame University (IN)
- Wuhan University (CN)
- China Institute of Water Resources and Hydropower Research (CN)
- Global Institute for Water Security (CA)
- University of Chinese Academy of Sciences (CN)
- Arizona State University (US)
- Capital Normal University (CN)
Publication Details
- Journal
- Journal of Hydrology
- Published
- 2024-09-06
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2024.131924
- Citations
- 2
- Primary Topic
- Plant Water Relations and Carbon Dynamics
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 0.57
Funders
- National Natural Science Foundation of China
- Wuhan University
- National Key Research and Development Program of China