Car ownership, carsharing, neighbourhood types and travel attitudes: A latent-cluster analysis

• Analyzes car ownership and carsharing decisions using Montreal (Canada) data. • Identifies four types of residential neighbourhoods using latent-cluster analysis. • Identifies four attitude-based profile of respondents using latent-cluster analysis. • Cross-analyzes the two segmentations to investigate car ownership/carsharing choice. • MNL confirms the influence of neighborhood types and attitude profiles on choice. The availability of carsharing in cities around the world has allowed more households to take advantage of the service as an alternative or a complement to private car ownership. While most research has looked at the effect of carsharing on car ownership decisions using carsharing users’ surveys, very few have modelled the choice of car ownership and carsharing jointly using independent surveys. This paper investigates the complex relationship between this joint decision, the built environment, and travel-related attitudes. Using data from two surveys in Montreal, latent-cluster analysis is used to identify a typology of residential neighbourhoods and a segmentation of attitude profiles. Cross-analyzing the two segmentations suggests that those with more positive attitudes towards the car are more likely to own cars and less likely to join carsharing across all neighbourhood types compared to less car-oriented profiles. However, people from all attitude profiles own fewer cars in more central neighbourhoods than in more suburban locations. Finally, a MNL model where sociodemographics and residential parking are controlled for confirms that both the built environment and attitudes independently influence the joint decision. Results also suggest that attitudes are associated with residential location choice, hinting at the presence of residential self-selection or environmental determinism. In summary, the analysis indicates that policy measures aimed at expanding carsharing vehicle availability for promoting carsharing as an alternative to car ownership may primarily impact individuals who are less drawn to the symbolic and emotional aspects of traditional cars.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Case Studies on Transport Policy
Published
2024-09-06
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cstp.2024.101292
Citations
4
Primary Topic
Transportation and Mobility Innovations
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.81

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Car ownership, carsharing, neighbourhood types and travel attitudes: A latent-cluster analysis

E. Owen D. Waygood, Jérôme Laviolette, Catherine Morency
4 citations
Case Studies on Transport Policy
Transportation and Mobility Innovations
0.81
article

Car ownership, carsharing, neighbourhood types and travel attitudes: A latent-cluster analysis

E. Owen D. Waygood, Jérôme Laviolette, Catherine Morency
article en
4 citations

Abstract

• Analyzes car ownership and carsharing decisions using Montreal (Canada) data. • Identifies four types of residential neighbourhoods using latent-cluster analysis. • Identifies four attitude-based profile of respondents using latent-cluster analysis. • Cross-analyzes the two segmentations to investigate car ownership/carsharing choice. • MNL confirms the influence of neighborhood types and attitude profiles on choice. The availability of carsharing in cities around the world has allowed more households to take advantage of the service as an alternative or a complement to private car ownership. While most research has looked at the effect of carsharing on car ownership decisions using carsharing users’ surveys, very few have modelled the choice of car ownership and carsharing jointly using independent surveys. This paper investigates the complex relationship between this joint decision, the built environment, and travel-related attitudes. Using data from two surveys in Montreal, latent-cluster analysis is used to identify a typology of residential neighbourhoods and a segmentation of attitude profiles. Cross-analyzing the two segmentations suggests that those with more positive attitudes towards the car are more likely to own cars and less likely to join carsharing across all neighbourhood types compared to less car-oriented profiles. However, people from all attitude profiles own fewer cars in more central neighbourhoods than in more suburban locations. Finally, a MNL model where sociodemographics and residential parking are controlled for confirms that both the built environment and attitudes independently influence the joint decision. Results also suggest that attitudes are associated with residential location choice, hinting at the presence of residential self-selection or environmental determinism. In summary, the analysis indicates that policy measures aimed at expanding carsharing vehicle availability for promoting carsharing as an alternative to car ownership may primarily impact individuals who are less drawn to the symbolic and emotional aspects of traditional cars.

Case Studies on Transport PolicyVol. 18
Polytechnique Montréal (CA)
Ministère de l'Économie, de l’Innovation et des Exportations du Québec, National Research Council Canada, Fonds de recherche du Québec – Nature et technologies
Sustainable cities and communities
Openalex Percentile: Top 29%
Transportation and Mobility Innovations
0.81
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.